01-28-2015 12:54 AM - edited 03-07-2019 10:24 PM
Hello,
Below is the configuration for the port security I have specified 10 maximum but when I connect 2 PC it goes in violation mode . Also the mac-add shown as static and not dynamic why that so???
when I apply the mac-address sticky command the same happen 2nd PC goes in violation mode.
interface GigabitEthernet2/0/14
switchport access vlan 41
switchport mode access
switchport voice vlan 40
switchport port-security maximum 10
switchport port-security violation restrict
switchport port-security
storm-control broadcast level 20.00
storm-control multicast level 20.00
spanning-tree portfast
spanning-tree bpduguard enable
sh mac address-table address a048.1c91.9310
Mac Address Table
-------------------------------------------
Vlan Mac Address Type Ports
---- ----------- -------- -----
41 a048.1c91.9310 STATIC Gi2/0/14
Total Mac Addresses for this criterion: 1
#sh mac address-table address bc16.f517.ca37
Mac Address Table
-------------------------------------------
Vlan Mac Address Type Ports
---- ----------- -------- -----
40 bc16.f517.ca37 STATIC Gi2/0/14
01-28-2015 02:50 AM
Hello,
Could you please share the output of:
show port-security int Gig2/0/14
show run | inc mac
?
We have very similar port-security settings on our switches and it's working fine. I've checked one of the ports and it's also showing "STATIC" for dynamically learned MAC addresses.
01-28-2015 04:42 AM
Dear,
Below is the output
I have slight change by applying command mac-address sticky. I have a laptop connected in vlan 30 in switch A, I removed the mac from the running configuration of the port before connecting in switch B in vlan 40,once I connect in port Gig 2/0/14 on switch B the laptop goes in violation mode, I have checked the mac of laptop in each and every switch of corporate it is not available then why it is going in violation mode.
thanks
# sh port-security interface gig2/0/14
Port Security : Enabled
Port Status : Secure-up
Violation Mode : Restrict
Aging Time : 0 mins
Aging Type : Absolute
SecureStatic Address Aging : Disabled
Maximum MAC Addresses : 10
Total MAC Addresses : 2
Configured MAC Addresses : 0
Sticky MAC Addresses : 2
Last Source Address:Vlan : bc16.f517.ca37:40
Security Violation Count : 0
interface GigabitEthernet2/0/4
switchport access vlan 41
switchport mode access
switchport voice vlan 40
switchport port-security maximum 10
switchport port-security violation restrict
switchport port-security mac-address sticky
switchport port-security mac-address sticky 000f.fe87.204e
switchport port-security
storm-control broadcast level 20.00
storm-control multicast level 20.00
spanning-tree portfast
spanning-tree bpduguard enable
end
sh mac address-table address 68b5.99eb.2e68
Mac Address Table
-------------------------------------------
Vlan Mac Address Type Ports
---- ----------- -------- -----
Jan 28 16:11:39.567: %PORT_SECURITY-2-PSECURE_VIOLATION: Security violation occurred, caused by MAC address 68b5.99eb.2e68 on port GigabitEthernet2/0/14
01-28-2015 04:42 AM
Hello Jack,
The "1FS1# sh port-security interface gig2/0/14" is looking fine (secure up, security violation count = 0), could you also do the same when the violation occurs? What is this MAC address - 68b5.99eb.2e68? It is not the same as on Gig2/0/4.
There is no interaction between switchports with the port-security feature, you can have the same MAC addresses saved (e.g. using the "sticky" keyword) for all the ports and still one port will not trigger any action on another one.
I am just thinking, if the configuration of "switch A" is working as expected, you can easily compare it with "switch B" to find any extra features that can be causing this.
Tom
01-28-2015 09:49 AM
Dear Tomas,
NO I have tested this,
What is this MAC address - 68b5.99eb.2e68? It is not the same as on Gig2/0/4.
this is the PC which is restricted once it is connected to port gig2/0/14,i don't know why??
But I have tested the below.
if a PC on switch A is connected with mac sticky and if we remove that PC and connect to switch B the port will go in violation state.
thanks
02-02-2015 01:27 AM
Hello Jack,
Sorry for a late response, I was away for a while. Did you manage to solve it yet? If not, let's check what is the output of "show port-security interface Gig2/0/14" and "show mac address-table | inc 2/0/14" when the violation happens. The configuration is very simple, so the solution should be as well.
Thanks!
Tom
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide