12-28-2015 01:00 AM - edited 03-08-2019 03:13 AM
Hello all.
we interesting where from ns developers takes.
for example:
exalink fusion
110 nanoseconds port to port latency with full layer 2 switching. The
industry's lowest latency cut-through layer 2 switch. Supports ultra-low
latency multicast and broadcast.
Latency
Measured front panel port to port:
➔ 5 ns (Layer 1 tap/patch)
➔ 95 ns (Layer 2 aggregation)
➔ 110ns (Layer 2 switching) ( !!!we interesting in this parameter )
mellanox sx1012
Lowest Latency
• 220nsec for 40/56GbE
• 250nsec for 10GbE
• Cut-through latency between ports in different speeds
but cisco got different numbers, by packet size.
so what are real tests for this NS?
how to make REAL compare.
12-29-2015 07:16 PM
Go find a third party independent report. Comparing marketing numbers is not going to help you.
12-30-2015 12:18 AM
yup. some reports from tolly was interesting. and supports of metamako, mellanox and exablaze send me their test with RFC 2544 FIFO .
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide