11-06-2015 06:28 AM - edited 03-08-2019 02:36 AM
Hello I am having trouble getting these switches to be able to see the networks. I did the ip route on the switch marked Buda_Switch and it is talking to the Congress_Switch just fine but i can not get the ip route to take in packet tracer to the Research_Switch and the Anderson_Mill_Switch. If anyone can help me out that will be great thank you. and here is my configurations.
Buda Switch
Solved! Go to Solution.
11-09-2015 03:36 AM
Hi,
On the BUDA switch you have 2 routes added:-
ip route 192.168.99.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.30.6
ip route 192.168.88.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.30.5
.5 & .6 are set set as your next hop but you dont have access to these addresses fronm this switch
Your vlan 30 has a 255.255.225.252 mask so your usable ip addresses are .1 & .2 only
This mistakes happens repeatably throughout your configs.
The next hop address should be on a subnet you the local device has access to.
To save you alwasys having to write static routes try using a routing protocol.
For this small network try RIP V2 (This supports varible length subnet masking)
On all switches remove all the static routes
no ip route ......
Implement RIP/V2 on all swithes
On BUDA
!
router rip
version 2
network 192.168.30.0
network192.168.66.0
no auto-summary
!
On Congress
!
router rip
version 2
network 192.168.30.0
network192.168.77.0
no auto-summary
!
On Research
!
router rip
version 2
network 192.168.30.0
network192.168.88.0
no auto-summary
!
Anderson_Mill
!
router rip
version 2
network 192.168.30.0
network192.168.99.0
no auto-summary
!
See this link for more info:-
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios/12_2/ip/configuration/guide/fipr_c/1cfrip.html
Regards
Alex
11-09-2015 03:36 AM
Hi,
On the BUDA switch you have 2 routes added:-
ip route 192.168.99.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.30.6
ip route 192.168.88.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.30.5
.5 & .6 are set set as your next hop but you dont have access to these addresses fronm this switch
Your vlan 30 has a 255.255.225.252 mask so your usable ip addresses are .1 & .2 only
This mistakes happens repeatably throughout your configs.
The next hop address should be on a subnet you the local device has access to.
To save you alwasys having to write static routes try using a routing protocol.
For this small network try RIP V2 (This supports varible length subnet masking)
On all switches remove all the static routes
no ip route ......
Implement RIP/V2 on all swithes
On BUDA
!
router rip
version 2
network 192.168.30.0
network192.168.66.0
no auto-summary
!
On Congress
!
router rip
version 2
network 192.168.30.0
network192.168.77.0
no auto-summary
!
On Research
!
router rip
version 2
network 192.168.30.0
network192.168.88.0
no auto-summary
!
Anderson_Mill
!
router rip
version 2
network 192.168.30.0
network192.168.99.0
no auto-summary
!
See this link for more info:-
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios/12_2/ip/configuration/guide/fipr_c/1cfrip.html
Regards
Alex
11-10-2015 05:15 AM
Okay that worked. Now I am configuring the actually switches they are the sg300 managed switches. I have two of them right now. how would i apply what you said to those switches because they do not support router rip
11-12-2015 09:25 AM
Hi,
I dont have much experience on the SG300s.
I did look at the admin book and they dont look like they support RIP.
You will need to use static routing.
You will need to make sure that the "NEXT HOP" you point to is pingable from
your switch IE// Your switch should be in the same subnet.
Regards
Alex
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide