01-15-2015 02:01 PM - edited 03-07-2019 10:14 PM
Hi All
I have set up one port (packets ingress) at the dot1Q tunnel all the packets are test generated so I know they will all egress via another port set up as the trunk port so what I am seeing is all the packets captured via tcpdump on the ingress port have a vlan tag 1-4095 (I generate 4095 pkts all with a vlan tag 1-4095 in order. now on the egress port I have another computer tcpdumping that interface and i see the same 1-4095 vlan tags even though the qinq is supposed to be additionally taging them into vlan 20 ... am I missing something?
Solved! Go to Solution.
01-16-2015 02:59 PM
Hi,
Oh... Very well, then.
To anyone intending to do some serious network experiments: Avoid Windows, use Linux instead.
Best regards,
Peter
01-15-2015 02:16 PM
Hi,
Would you mind posting the complete configuration of the ingress and egress port?
Best regards,
Peter
01-16-2015 11:48 AM
ok Ill post it
its from that non cisco switch hope thats ok cli commands are very similar ...I am waiting on that 3550 which I belives needs some licensing to run QinQ
Ill post the config in a sec just reseting it
01-16-2015 01:26 PM
ok here is the config
this is not a CISCO config , so if you could just outline what i would need to do on a CISCO 3550 command wise to QinQ , double tag, all tagged packets coming in in the dot1q port so that they have 2 vlanid inner and outer (outer ==333) when they leave the egress port which is set up as a trunk port, and all untagged packet will just get the 1 tag 333 as they leave the trunk port
01-16-2015 02:27 PM
Aaaaagghhh please disregard this post my PIC in win7 was stripping the outer tag for me
a chance reboot into ubuntu reveals the truth on the qinq.
Sorry Paul
01-16-2015 02:59 PM
Hi,
Oh... Very well, then.
To anyone intending to do some serious network experiments: Avoid Windows, use Linux instead.
Best regards,
Peter
01-17-2015 02:42 PM
Yes I heartily agree ..I booted into my win7 image to fill in my time sheet (its a windows forms app) after doing so I thought id just continue on doing my testing work .... I marked your above statement as a correct anwswer
01-16-2015 02:52 PM
Hello,
The configuration of the 3550 would be similar to this:
vlan 333 name Customer ! interface FastEthernet0/1 description => Ingress Dot1Q Tunnel Port Toward a Customer <= switchport mode dot1q-tunnel switchport access vlan 333 ! interface FastEthernet0/2 description => Egress Trunk <= switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport mode trunk
Best regards,
Peter
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide