STP provides for that. If you build multiple connections, STP blocks all but one, but keeps the others as alternate paths.
If you use plain old STP, you'll see some lag when a link goes down while spanning-tree converges.
With Rapid STP, the lag is reduced significantly to the point you don't notice it.
There are 8 building which are interconnect via 1G fiber optic ring. here we need to connect around 500 IP cams to a centralised locations by using Cisco catalyst 3560-X and 4503 switches. As we have 1G back bone ring, what I thing is not sufficient. So I just wanted look at setting up of load balancing in ring topology which leads to connect 1G uplink from bi-direction so enhance possibility of 2G throughput to centralised location. if we implement STP there is only one active connection to its root so there may be chance to choke my Bandwidth. So please suggest me some of good protocol with topology for efficient implementation of this network.
Thanks for your time
Abdul Fathah MK
Aah.. Now I think I understand what you're talking about.
It sounds like you've got a vendor provided optical ring with 1 Gig handoffs.
If you're just using Layer 2 switching, you'll only have a single path.
If you're using Layer 3 routing at each building, you can use EIGRP or any decent routing protocol (EIGRP is easiest to configure and tune). This is assuming you are using a Layer 3 switch at each handoff.
A Layer 3 routing protocol will provide you with use of both rings simultaneously, assuming you have them in separate subnets.
One more thing.
If you "think" its insufficient, I wouldn't spend the money on a second gig handoff. You should be able to PROVE it.
What is your load at the gig handoffs? (A show interface will tell you)
nice ...Could you please elaborate with an example how can we set up layer 3 routing protocol in switching enviornment here we are having 500 hosts from 8 buliding interconnected via Fiber optic ring to centralised location. and using Cisco catalyst 3560-X series with IP Base Image. whether layer3 protocol supported by IP base image or not ?. and what enhance we should make it to work.
we need to make all location in a different subnet or not ?
Thanks for your time
Assuming your router, using ip base, can support eigrp (I didn't look that up, but you should), here's a drawing and configuration example:
If you have 8 buildings, this will work. If you have 8 buildings plus a central data center, just give the data center the .1 address.
Here's the config I use for the same type of ring connectivity:
ip address 10.100.0.1 255.255.255.0
ip address 10.200.0.1 255.255.255.0
description Local Lan subnet
ip address (whatever)
router eigrp 90
##make sure you add your local lan subnet if it's something other than 10.x.x.x
no passive-interface default
The delay 7 on the ring interfaces will keep your local lans from traversing the ring for local connectivity inside the building.
Hope this makes sense!
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
How to set up reduntant LAN Ring topolog with load balancing for a cisco catalyst 3560 platform.
For L2, if you can split your hosts into at least two VLANs, PVST or MST would allow load balancing for the separate VLANs while still supporting redundancy.
I f you have the 3560 Ip Base image, i recommend to Implement EIGRP. For the core implement a full EIGRP As and for each building EIGRP Stub network.
For load balance, it is necessary to know wich switch and its way of connection are you using in the Central Building, with this number of end devices i strongly recommend you, at least, a single Catalyst 6500 Chasis with two 720 VSS Supervisor and redudancy components (Power supplies and line cards) or if there is economical contraints deploy a single chasis with redundancy elements.
Now if you have separate switches witch separate IP Addresses you wont be able to configure an etherchannel or load load balance betwen the building and the central one. At least you need a pair of Catalyst 3750x series stacked or any of the 2 situations that i suggest you previously.