cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
3436
Views
0
Helpful
6
Replies

Remove stack master with no service disruption

Hi,

I have to remove the stack master switch with no service disruption.

I've tried to do this some minutes ago and the whole network was brought down.

Cabling is ok, because before the master power off i've removed all cables connected to it and services was ok, so, the whole routing was on the slave device.

After master poweroff, the slave loss it's connectivity to each device. Should I check something ?

Configuration on the slave is ok, with vlan and trunking properly configured on every interfaces and portchannel was ok and up.

Seems that the whole routing table was non synchronized between members...

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

Reza Sharifi
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

Hi,

Is switch priority set correctly on all your switches?

Are you running the same exact IOS on all your switches?

What is the output of "sh switch"?

Did you follow this link to remove the switch?

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps5023/products_configuration_example09186a00807811ad.shtml#stack6

HTH

View solution in original post

6 Replies 6

Reza Sharifi
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

Hi,

Is switch priority set correctly on all your switches?

Are you running the same exact IOS on all your switches?

What is the output of "sh switch"?

Did you follow this link to remove the switch?

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps5023/products_configuration_example09186a00807811ad.shtml#stack6

HTH

Sorry, i've clicked the wrong button.

I haven't followed that instruction, because I would like to simulate a power failure and in that case i'll not be able to follow some steps before the suddenly power failure.

If I power down the master switch, slave will stops to switch packets untile the master comes back.

Joseph W. Doherty
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

Disclaimer

The   Author of this posting offers the information contained within this   posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that   there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose.   Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not   be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of  this  posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.

Liability Disclaimer

In   no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including,   without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising  out  of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if  Author  has been advised of the possibility of such damage.

Posting

If I remember correctly, loss of stack master will (temporarily) impact L3.  Impact to pure L2 should be minimal although if stack has gateway, gateway's MAC will change unless configured to not so so or using a virtual MAC.  (NB: stack should issue a gratuitous ARP with MAC change.)  Also, if dealing with other network switches and/or routers, you might need to insure this stack and other devices have optimal configuration, e.g. NSF aware or enabled, STP, etc.

There isn't any gateway on stack. I'm using it as plain L2 switches. No IP or similiar at all.

If you power down the master, the switch with highest priority should  take over the responsibility of the master and should start forwarding packet with no delays.  That is purpose of stacking.  Check your switches and make sure the priorities are set correctly.

I have only 2 switches, so it can't be a priority issue.

With master down, the only available switch will be the master, regardless it's priority.