cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
266
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies

routing with NAT on connected network - possible ?

SJ K
Level 5
Level 5

Hi all,

Let's say i have a Router A connected to 192.168.5.0/24 network on fa0/1

It is connected to router B on int fa0/0 through /30 point to point link.  (10.10.10.1 and 10.10.10.2)

Router B also has a 192.168.5.0/24 network.

Assuming hostA

192.168.5.1 on SiteA/Router A needs to talk to 192.168.5.2/24 on SiteB/RouterB

q1) how do i direct RouterA to send it traffic out via fa0/0 interface ? a static route won't work since a directly connected route have higher AD.

q2) I am thinking of assigning a NAT range to the 192.168.50.0/24 range on Site B.  So instead of Host A sending  traffic to 192.168.5.2, it will be sending to 192.168.50.2.  What must i configure on Site B, so that when it receive traffic destined for 192.168.50.2, it will be mapped to 192.168.5.2 ( HostA at siteA will be the one that initiate the traffic)

--  I also know this means that i also must do NAT on the source traffic on 192.168.5.0/24 in Site A

q3) Having the above , does that means I must/can only use a static route in SiteA/RouterA to point to the "192.168.50.0/24"  range in Site B ?

e.g. 192.168.50.0  255.255.255.0  10.10.10.2

is there anyway i can use dynamic routing protocols ? such that RouterB/SiteB will actually advertise its NAT range (192.168.50.0) towards RouteA/SiteA and vice versa ?

Regards,
Noob

1 Reply 1

Michael Muenz
Level 5
Level 5

Which routers are you using? If you really wanna do this I'd use pseudo-wire with L2TPv3.

Then there's no need for NAT.

Michael Please rate all helpful posts