04-04-2017 09:17 PM - edited 03-08-2019 10:03 AM
04-04-2017 09:45 PM
Hi
I think you could use 2 different remote vlans
SWITCH 1
vlan 10
name voice vlan
vlan 255
name SWITCH1
remote-span
vlan 256
name SWITCH2
remote-span
monitor session 1 source vlan 10 both
monitor session 1 destination interface g1/40
monitor session 2 source vlan 10 both
monitor session 2 destination remote vlan 255
monitor session 3 source remote vlan 256
monitor session 3 destination interface g1/40
SWITCH 2
vlan 10
name voice vlan
vlan 255
name SWITCH1
remote-span
vlan 256
name SWITCH2
remote-span
monitor session 1 source vlan 10 both
monitor session 1 destination interface g1/40
monitor session 2 source vlan 10 both
monitor session 2 destination remote vlan 256
monitor session 3 source remote vlan 255
monitor session 3 destination interface g1/40
* If you have applying any restriction over the trunk interfaces you must add these remote span vlans on both trunk interfaces.
To be honest I have no implemented this kind of scenario with 2 recording systems receiving the same traffic, but this configuration could be useful, also verify if this switch models support more than 2 monitor sessions.
:-)
04-04-2017 09:45 PM
Yes that is their requirement.
04-05-2017 12:16 AM
Hi Julio,
I tried the same method, but there is an error when I try to use same destination port for 2 sessions. Cisco does not allow it. I can't think of other possible way.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide
Hi,
We have two 2960X switches in a call center and two call recording servers connected to port 40 in both switches. (switch is not a stack).
They need to monitor voice vlan of both switches in to both recording servers.
(SW1 & SW2 voice vlan traffic mirror to port 40 of SW1 & SW2.)
Can somebody help us with any idea? Thank you very much.