Hello Haris,
What you want to do cannot be done using Spanning Tree Protocol, and it is not a good idea anyway.
If a port is in the STP Forwarding state then it is open for both directions - incoming and outgoing traffic. The STP does not consider the direction of data flow when computing the spanning tree, and has no provisions for doing that. Thus, a spanning tree created by the STP is used to convey data in both directions.
Moreover, your idea of having an upstream traffic going through a different link than the downstream traffic goes against the logic of Ethernet frame switching. If an upstream frame arrives on a port A, the switch will learn the source MAC of this frame and ascribe it to the port A. When a reply arrives, the switch will forward the reply out the port A because that is where the original source is connected. Note that this even does not have anything to do with the STP at all.
Forcing a traffic to go different path in upstream direction and different path in downstream direction in a switched topology could also cause unnecessary flooding of unicast traffic. If a bidirectional data flow does not pass the same devices and links in the topology, switches are unable to learn the location of the destination MACs, resulting in flooding the unicast streams, which is certainly something we do not want to see.
Best regards,
Peter
