07-18-2011 05:15 AM - edited 03-07-2019 01:15 AM
Hi,
We recently installed the sup 7-E there are two cores on Ist core cpu utilization is 10% and on other one it is 15 % .can any one tell on what basis the cpu processing decision is made and why it is lesson Ist core and high on other core.
Regards,
Rajat
07-25-2011 04:19 AM
Rajat
Sincere apologies for misunderstanding your question. I can see now why my answers were only confusing the issue and didn't help.
Jon
08-01-2011 03:45 AM
Hi Rajat,
i opened an TAC case and the engineer solved my problem. i got a whole bunch of L3/SVI interfaces and a few of them did not include the "no ip redirects" command. after applying it to all interfaces the cpu load dropped to 25-30%. here is the original mail:
-------------------------------------------------------
- After checking further saw that there were noticeable drops by looking at the output of 'sh plat cpu packet driver', it's clear that CPU is getting packets at high rate in Queue number 1 for the event(57) 'Adj Same If(IP Redirects or routing via same interface)' which would be causing the high CPU :
switch# sh plat cpu packet driver
Forerunner Packet Engine 0.278
Receive Queues: dropped packets summary
Qu Total Packets Drop No Cell Drop Overrun Drop Underrun
19 103593805 3658 0 0
57 99598717 338725 0 0
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Receive Queues: dropped packets summary
Qu Total Packets Drop No Cell Drop Overrun Drop Underrun
19 133629002 3658 0 0
57 159097464 635503 0 0
<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Action Plan:
############
- We need to plan to disable "IP Redirects" on SVI/L3 interfaces on the switch. As a best practice we should disable ip redirects if we are not using the same as per design :
--------------------------------------------
Regards,
Gernot
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide