10-22-2015 06:38 PM - edited 03-08-2019 02:21 AM
Hi all,
I have 2 7000 series, I have created
What I don't understand is, I created the peer-link and
Thanks.
Solved! Go to Solution.
10-23-2015 09:17 AM
Hi,
I think this was why there was confusion. In the original post you stated MDS 9000.
So the answer is yes. The Nexus 7700 and 9000 both support vPC and so you can build a double sided vPC between them.
The Quick Start Guide :: Virtual Port Channel (vPC) is an excellent reference and has an example on slide 19.
Regards
10-22-2015 07:50 PM
Hi,
You can simply connect the servers to the 9000 using Portchannels. There is no need for VPC.
HTH
10-23-2015 08:45 AM
Hi all,
If I have this diagram and not
7700 <-
9000 <-
Now I want to
10-23-2015 08:58 AM
Hi,
When you say "9000" do you mean Cisco MDS 9000 i.e., a SAN switch or do you mean Cisco Nexus 9000 as you stated in your original post?
If you mean MDS 9000 series switch, then as per the previous comments, you would need to use a standard port-channel as vPC is not supported on this platform.
If you mean Nexus 9000, these do support vPC and so you could connect the Nexus 9000 vPC domain to the Nexus 7700 vPC domain using the "double side" vPC.
Regards
10-23-2015 09:05 AM
Hello Steve,
My 9000
10-23-2015 09:16 AM
As Steve said, you can connect each of the C9372PX switches to both 7700 switches. This would be a double sided VPC.
HTH
10-23-2015 09:23 AM
So if I apply this
10-23-2015 09:29 AM
Correct. As I said, slide 19 of the quick start guide I linked to previously has a working example.
Regards
10-23-2015 10:59 AM
Hi all
I just did the configuration recommended and now have this error.
vPC status
----------------------------------------------------------------------
id Port Status Consistency Reason Active vlans
-- ---- ------ ----------- ------ ------------
20 Po20 down* failed vpc port channel -
mis-config due to vpc
links in the 2 switches
connected to different
partners
Any ideas?
10-24-2015 10:28 AM
Hi,
It's not clear which switch you ran this command from, but essentially it's telling you that the Link Aggregation (LAG) System ID being received from the two devices connected to the interfaces that are members of port-channel 20 is different on each interface. As you have port-channel 20 configured as a vPC, then it expects the ID to the same.
If you run the command show lacp neighbor interface port-channel 20, the Partner System ID see on all the physical interfaces should be same.
In my setup I have a vPC domain formed from switch1 and switch2 connected via eth1/1 and eth1/2 to a second vPC domain formed from switch3 and switch4. In the following you can see the LAG Partner System ID is the same on eth1/1 and eth1/2 of both switch1 and switch2:
switch1# sh lacp nei int po11 Flags: S - Device is sending Slow LACPDUs F - Device is sending Fast LACPDUs A - Device is in Active mode P - Device is in Passive mode port-channel11 neighbors Partner's information Partner Partner Partner Port System ID Port Number Age Flags Eth1/1 32667,0-23-4-ee-be-b 0x101 835 SA LACP Partner Partner Partner Port Priority Oper Key Port State 32768 0x800b 0x3d Partner's information Partner Partner Partner Port System ID Port Number Age Flags Eth1/2 32667,0-23-4-ee-be-b 0x4101 768 SA LACP Partner Partner Partner Port Priority Oper Key Port State 32768 0x800b 0x3d switch2# sh lacp nei int po11 Flags: S - Device is sending Slow LACPDUs F - Device is sending Fast LACPDUs A - Device is in Active mode P - Device is in Passive mode port-channel11 neighbors Partner's information Partner Partner Partner Port System ID Port Number Age Flags Eth1/1 32667,0-23-4-ee-be-b 0x102 879 SA LACP Partner Partner Partner Port Priority Oper Key Port State 32768 0x800b 0x3d Partner's information Partner Partner Partner Port System ID Port Number Age Flags Eth1/2 32667,0-23-4-ee-be-b 0x4102 812 SA LACP Partner Partner Partner Port Priority Oper Key Port State 32768 0x800b 0x3d
The Partner System ID should match the System MAC address of the downstream devices, and if those devices are also running vPC, the System ID should be the MAC address seen when you run the show vpc role command on those downstream devices. For example:
switch3# sh vpc role vPC Role status ---------------------------------------------------- vPC role : primary Dual Active Detection Status : 0 vPC system-mac : 00:23:04:ee:be:0b vPC system-priority : 32667 vPC local system-mac : 54:7f:ee:0c:18:3c vPC local role-priority : 1 switch4# sh vpc role vPC Role status ---------------------------------------------------- vPC role : secondary Dual Active Detection Status : 0 vPC system-mac : 00:23:04:ee:be:0b vPC system-priority : 32667 vPC local system-mac : 54:7f:ee:10:ce:7c vPC local role-priority : 2
Are you able to post a diagram of the setup showing the interfaces that connect between the four switches? Also can you post the output of the following commands from all four switches i.e., both the Nexus 7700 and Nexus 9000
Regards
10-23-2015 09:17 AM
Hi,
I think this was why there was confusion. In the original post you stated MDS 9000.
So the answer is yes. The Nexus 7700 and 9000 both support vPC and so you can build a double sided vPC between them.
The Quick Start Guide :: Virtual Port Channel (vPC) is an excellent reference and has an example on slide 19.
Regards
10-23-2015 09:33 AM
Please check the link below. You are able to config all switches in one VPC domain..
You can find all cautions related to one VPC domain or and two VPC domains.
.
http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/switches/datacenter/sw/design/vpc_design/vpc_best_practices_design_guide.pdf
10-22-2015 09:54 PM
You need to configure a VPC on 7000-1 and 7000-2 for MDS connection( suppose MDS has one link connected to each 7000)
Configuration looks like this.
7000-1
int po100
switch mode trunk
vpc 100
int e1/3 [ connected to MDS]
channel-group 30 mode active
7000-2
int po100
switch mode trunk
vpc 100 [Connected to MDS]
int e1/3
channel-group 30 mode active
On MDS, you need to create just a regular port-channel for 7000-1 and 7000-2 connection
and some other regular port-channels for your server connections . ( one for each server)
As you can see the term of VPC is only used on 7000. Your MDS sees VPC peers as a single device.
Hope it helps.
Masoud
10-22-2015 11:56 PM
Hi all, I have 2 7000 series, I have created peer-link and peer-keepalive between them, I will connect this device to my MDS 9000 series, this ones have differente server connected to there ports. What I don't understand is, I created the peer-link and keepalive between the 7000, when I connect from the 9000 to the 7000 do I have to use VPC per each server I have in the 9000 or I justa have to ues port-channles? Thanks.
Hi,
As suggested , Create vPC domain for two N7k and you can create Multi chasis ether channel with MDS to N7k switches for uplink connectivity.
Considering you have single MDS switch then from server to MDS you can go with simple port channel.
Check out the below link on vPC design which can be helpful for your implementation.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/nexus-9000-series-switches/guide-c07-733228.html
Hope it Helps..
-GI
Rate if it Helps
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide