cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
279
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies

VPN, NAT and EIGRP

Nicolas Marchal
Level 1
Level 1

Hi everybody,

I manage a DMVPN hub and Spoke (with EIGRP) network with around 1000 Spoke connected all around Europe. 

I need to give a remote access to this network to one of our partners via a site to site VPN. Problem is that this partner is using a network IP range already used in my network.

I need to give access from 192.168.3.0/24 to 10.87.0.0/16 but 192.168.3.0 is already used in my network.

The site-to-site VPN is configured that way: 

crypto isakmp policy 10

encr aes 256

authentication pre-share

group 2

lifetime 28800

 

crypto isakmp key […] address […]

 

crypto map VPN 10 ipsec-isakmp

description Open-Sky

set peer […]

set transform-set trans3

match address Partner_Name

ip access-list extended Partner_Name

permit ip 10.79.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255

interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0

crypto map VPN

Then I configure NAT (I want to NAT 192.168.3.0 to 10.242.128.0)

ip access-list extended Open_Sky_NAT1

permit ip 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 10.79.0.0 0.0.255.255

 

ip nat pool Open_Sky_NAT1 10.242.128.1 10.242.128.254 netmask 255.255.255.0

 

ip nat outside source list Open_Sky_NAT1 pool Open_Sky_NAT1 add-route

I also tried this NAT with a route-map. 

This is working perfectly but I need to advertise 10.242.128.0 network to my EIGRP network. So I added the following route:

ip route 10.242.128.0 255.255.255.0 Gig 0/0/0

When adding that route, EIGRP properly advertised all my other routers (I see the right route to my routers) but the NAT/VPN doesn't work anymore.

When this route is added, my packets are reaching the 10.79.0.0 network but doesn't go to the VPN. (no packets encrypted).

I assume they are redirected directly to my gig0/0/0 interface without being encrypted in my site-to-site VPN.

So... What am I doing wrong ? Any idea ?

Thanks in advance for your help.

1 Reply 1

Nicolas Marchal
Level 1
Level 1

Ok.

I've found a solution to my issue. If you encounter the same.

I just replaced: ip route 10.242.128.0 255.255.255.0 Gig 0/0/0

with ip route 10.242.128.0 255.255.255.0 [GATEWAY_IP]

Still don't know why it was not working with the first command because I have another router (same model, same version) which is working with both configuration....

see ya.

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card