03-18-2021 04:51 AM
Hi Community,
I'll need your help to advise on the above, from my reading there is no way to switch the standby SUP on the primary Switch. Resetting/reloading the active SUP will automatically failover to the Active SUP in the second switch which will take the primary role.
03-18-2021 06:15 AM
if you want to standby to move active - means you need to switch over from active to standby right ? - is this what you looking
To force a switchover from the VSS active to the VSS standby supervisor engine, use the redundancy force-switchover command.
03-18-2021 06:54 AM
Hi Balaji,
Thank you for your reply.
Indeed, I do not want to switchover from the VSS active to the VSS standby. I want just to switch from the Active SUP to the standby SUP on the Active VSS.
03-18-2021 07:15 AM
Hi,
There is no way to fail from primary sup to backup sup in the same chassis. When you fail it, it will fail to the backup chassis. That is actually one of the reasons that quad sup VSS is not popular.
HTH
03-18-2021 07:48 AM
@Reza Sharifi i agree - may be i have not cleared in the old post - Quad supervisor work in Z fail over method.
03-18-2021 08:11 AM
BB,
Yeah, In my opinion, quad sup deployments are a waste of money and make failover and redundancy complicated!
Reza
03-18-2021 08:25 AM
Agreed, but some organisation want to very high availability and cisco smart support 4 hours replacement also (not make any sense for me). may be business requiement and complaince.
03-18-2021 09:37 AM
Thank you for your feedback. Indeed I'm expecting an issue with the active SUP. Which will be the best way to reset this card, please? Here are the commands as far as I know: #hw-module switch 1 module x reset #redundancy force-switchover I think both of them will result in the reboot of the VSS Active, but I want just to know which way would be better.
03-18-2021 11:00 AM
You want to use
redundancy force-switchover
so you fail to the backup chassis.
HTH
03-18-2021 12:48 PM
Hi Reza, Thank you for your feedback.
So the command "redundancy force-switchover" has the same behavior as the command "hw-module switch 1 module x reset", please (rebooting the primary chassis)? Is it better to use the first command?
03-18-2021 12:54 PM
Hi,
Yes, since this is VSS, I would do redundancy force-switchover
Please make sure you do this in a maintenance window just in case something goes wrong. Also, before you do this, make sure all your access switches are connected to both chassis.
HTH
03-18-2021 03:45 PM
Hi Reza,
Thank you for your support.
Last question: when issuing the command "redundancy force-switchover", the SW1 (primary chassis) will it reboot (including the line cards..etc), please?
03-19-2021 03:21 AM
yes correct - to make standby chansis active
that is the reason always suggest to you should have dual path, orphan ports have downtime.
03-18-2021 09:39 AM
Thank you for your feedback. Indeed I'm expecting an issue with the active SUP. Which will be the best way to reset this card, please? Here are the commands as far as I know: "hw-module switch 1 module x reset" & "redundancy force-switchover" I think both of them will result in the reboot of the VSS Active, but I want just to know which way would be better.
03-19-2021 05:00 AM - edited 03-19-2021 05:03 PM
Hello
As the guys have mentioned:
If the primary sup fails in chassis X the standby sup in Chassis Y becomes active as such the standby sup in chassis X sup becomes standby.
Next if the primary sup fails in chassis Y the 2nd standby sup in Chassis X becomes active and the 2nd standby sup in chassis Y sup becomes standby.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide