06-16-2011 04:23 AM - edited 03-07-2019 12:50 AM
Hello,
I was wondering if someone could answer the following question for me:
I'm seeing SVI interfaces hit 160% utilisation on some of our 6509 switches.
As these switches are in a VSS setup, is the utilisation effectively divided by the two VSS switches and if so, would it be good practise to say configure the SVI interfaces
with 2Gb bandwidth statements as opposed to the default of 1Gb?
Regards,
Pat
06-16-2011 05:07 AM
Hi Pat,
Watch out for high CPU utilization, specially if you are running a modular code. In VSS the 6500 logically become one switch and the config applies to the entire system not to one switch. So, I don't think changing SVI bandwidth has any effect. Monitor the CPU, and if it is not high, you should be fine.
HTH
06-16-2011 09:36 AM
Hello Pat,
VSS only divides forwarding-plane for optimal switching. Logically it is a single switch to control and manage which is handled by SSO-ACTIVE supervisor that may be current on Switch-1 or Switch-2.
VSS solves technical challenge by virtualizing two physical systems deployed in same common network layer and in common role. When it is deployed with best practices, you should not see increase on interfaces compared to Standalone design. I recommend you reading Chapter 2 of following Design Guide that shares best practices to minimize control-plane usage, improve forwarding-plane capacity and build more resilient network design independent of network tier - Core or Aggregation :
Borderless Campus 1.0 Design Guide
SVI is an logical interface, capacity is derived from where the VLAN is associated to physical interface and not the logical...
thanks,
rahul.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide