06-16-2017 05:26 AM - edited 03-18-2019 01:13 PM
We have been noticing some issues when users are doing their Outlook 2016 meeting bookings with TMSXE.
When selecting more than 1 video conference unit in their meeting invite, when looking within the List Conferences in TMS, it is only showing that the user selected only 1 video conference. Although, when reviewing their actual Outlook meeting invite, it does show all of the appropriate video conferences selected.
Our users are not getting any reply back emails stating that the unit cannot be booked and therefore it comes as a surprise, when the time comes for the meeting, that their is a video conference connection missing.
We are using TMS 15.5.0 and TMSXE 5.5.0
Note that this was also occurring on the lower versions of TMS and TMSXE but when we upgrade the software versions, it 'sometimes' resolves itself.
Has anyone else experienced this issue?
06-21-2017 09:39 AM
I would recommend reviewing TMSXE debug logs for details of what is and isn't getting booked.
07-25-2018 01:35 PM
07-25-2018 10:13 PM
07-26-2018 04:49 AM
Did you receive an email from Exchange that the Resource Mailbox has been booked? I had this issue at a customer as well, and it happened because some rooms/mailboxes did not have auto-accept meeting invites enabled.
07-26-2018 09:19 AM
Yes, the confirmation email included the correct # of rooms for this particular meeting. The odd thing is I have had issues with both sides or the process happen over the past year. TMS schedule is correct, # of rooms, etc. and the Outlook calendar is wrong and then the opposite, Outlook calendars reflect correct information but TMS is missing a room for the conference.
I have been working with our Exchange analyst and we checked all the auto-accept options to make sure they were correct and they were on the three rooms I'm testing right now. The only differences we could see was that the room in question had delegates assigned to it. We have some rooms that we don't want just anyone to be able to schedule.
But this is not directly responsible I'm thinking because we have other rooms that are set with delegates that have no problems.
Also, even though for this room the delegates were present, we had the room set to auto-accept and my Exchange guy says that should override the delegate entries.
Our Exchange server was upgraded to 2016 not too long ago (about two months) and the CAS mailboxes names changed as a part of it so I started there to see if the fix was easy but we were in the Shell and checking settings and so far everything maps to Cisco Best Practices. Now I am wondering if the latest version of TMSXE is my next step. Didn't want to get into updating again but might need to.
And I have questions about TMSPE. We don't check it as often as we probably should so I am curious where it and EWS fall into this so if anyone is familiar with the flow and wants to shed more light on it than I have had time to get myself that would be great too.
07-26-2018 09:21 AM
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide