05-22-2013 09:13 AM - edited 03-18-2019 01:09 AM
Hello,
I run a lab for a customer in wich I should test Smart Scheduler but I cannot get it launched. I cann access the tmsagent/portal. I can click th home button and the settings button. I can access findme configuration but smart scheduler would not launch with an error message, otherwise, it would probably be a java issue (from what i read in forums and guides). the message is
There was a problem connecting to the scheduler backend : Could not send Message.
Any idea what this message is related to ?
Thanks,
Cecile
Solved! Go to Solution.
05-31-2013 03:47 AM
Hello All,
This indeed is a bug. Unfortunately I don't have a bug reference for you right now. Once I have one, I'll let you know.
The problem stems from different server configurations concerning the use of the loopback address...meaning in the case we are working, they don't use the loopback address on their server. For example, and looking at the IIS logs and when the loopback address is being used, you should see something like the following concerning the SS:
2013-05-28 09:03:25 127.0.0.1 POST /tms/external/booking/bookingservice.asmx -
In the customer's case, they see the following:
2013-05-29 15:50:48 192.168.x.x POST /tms/external/booking/bookingservice.asmx - 443
Note the return of the local IP address vs. the loopback address.
In your case, I would take a look in the IIS log...after you throw the error in SS...and see if this is what you see. If so, then this is the same problem and this is the problem we're fixing...meaning we'll check not only for the loopback address but the local IP address as well.
cheers,
Dale
05-31-2013 05:55 AM
cecile gallien wrote:
[...] I hope you can provide a bug id with a version of resolution.
Bug ID: CSCuh24788. We'll fix it the next possible TMS release – 14.2.2.
Regards,
Kjetil
05-29-2013 04:33 AM
Hi Cecile,
I see that you posted this awhile go but haven't got an answer, but before I get into a series of questions...have you resolved your issue?
rgds,
Dale
05-29-2013 09:35 AM
Hi Cecile, it's probably because https is not enabled on TMS server.
Smart Scheduler only works over https.
05-29-2013 10:13 AM
Hello Thomas,
No it was not a https issue. It was a TMSPE configuration issue as my serveur is working only over certificates and I did not provide the proper one and credetials where wrong.
So I have reached next step. I can launch the smart scheduler and do a booking. I get a license issue now which I am very surpised of :
No more Application Integration licenses available (using: 1). For information on how to order more licenses, please contact Cisco.
Here are the licenses I have on my TMS
- Cisco TMS Application Integration License (1 servers) - I have a Lotus Integration
- Cisco TMS Provisioning Extension (25 active clients/devices)
- Systems (10 systems)
I thought Smart Scheduler was not subject to any licensing ?
Cecile
05-29-2013 10:51 AM
Considering the fact you must have a valid certificate for enabling https, I would be tempted to think I was kind of right... But anyway, you've been able to figure out the problem and find a solution, it's the most important.
Now, for your licensing issue, I would think it's a bug. How can TMS throw "no more license availabe" when a server license is in fact installed? I've personally never experienced similar issue but I can try to reproduce it.
Dale, any thoughts?
05-29-2013 11:39 AM
Sounds like bug as bot the lotus notes integration and the smart scheduler are utilizing the TMSBA. I think I remember once a booking is done from lotus notes the application integration only accepts bookings from that server for the next
/Magnus
05-29-2013 12:03 PM
Good catch, Magnus and I now understand better what server licenses mean... it's not one license for the local TMS server as I was thinking but a license to allow access to the booking API from 1 (or more) sever(s). In that case, it makes complete sense to lock down the connection on first incoming IP address, except that requests coming from localhost should have been allowed for the Smart Scheduler... As you said, it's to be tested.
05-30-2013 02:21 AM
Hello,
thanks for reply.
I removed my licence '
Cisco TMS Application Integration License (1 servers)' and now when I use Smart Scheduler I have this funny message :
An option key is required to use this feature. For more information, please contact Cisco.
I am very perplex. If you need more details let me know.
Thanks,
Cecile
05-29-2013 11:51 PM
Hi,
The Smart Scheduler should be bypassing the license check.
I have seen this issue at another customer site as well, and we have identified a possible TMS defect that can trigger this problem. Please open a TAC service request so that TAC can investigate the root cause of your problem.
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App
05-30-2013 02:21 AM
Oups, I did not reach the last post. So I write it again :
Hello,
thanks for reply.
I removed my licence 'Cisco TMS Application Integration License (1 servers)' and now when I use Smart Scheduler I have this funny message :
An option key is required to use this feature. For more information, please contact Cisco.
I am very perplex. If you need more details let me know.
Thanks,
Cecile
05-30-2013 04:45 AM
As Kjetil says above, the SS bypasses the license check and we are tracking another similar issue meaning indeed this could be a bug. Therefore, open a case to TAC...referencing this thread...so has to get proper tracking.
/dale
05-30-2013 06:33 AM
Hi guys,
Thanks for replies and suggestion of a TAC. I will proceed so as soon as I get access to TSRT. So far I get a message that says my login ID is not set up to access the TAC Service Request Tool - i had access before. I sent an email to tac to check this point and i let you know when i can go next step and provide you the SR if needed.
Regards,
Cecile
05-31-2013 03:47 AM
Hello All,
This indeed is a bug. Unfortunately I don't have a bug reference for you right now. Once I have one, I'll let you know.
The problem stems from different server configurations concerning the use of the loopback address...meaning in the case we are working, they don't use the loopback address on their server. For example, and looking at the IIS logs and when the loopback address is being used, you should see something like the following concerning the SS:
2013-05-28 09:03:25 127.0.0.1 POST /tms/external/booking/bookingservice.asmx -
In the customer's case, they see the following:
2013-05-29 15:50:48 192.168.x.x POST /tms/external/booking/bookingservice.asmx - 443
Note the return of the local IP address vs. the loopback address.
In your case, I would take a look in the IIS log...after you throw the error in SS...and see if this is what you see. If so, then this is the same problem and this is the problem we're fixing...meaning we'll check not only for the loopback address but the local IP address as well.
cheers,
Dale
05-31-2013 05:31 AM
Hello Dale,
you are right . I had a look on my IIS logs and I get this line :
2013-05-31 12:18:56 10.77.200.249 POST /tms/external/booking/bookingservice.asmx - 443 VIDEO\cgallien 10.77.x.x TMSScheduler 200 0 0 312
where 10.77.x.x is my TMS Server.
I have a question : would TMS keep using local loopback with https and certificate ? I do not have localhost in my certificate defined as CN, only my FQDN. The idea is to avoid any certificate issue.
I searched a bit further and I found another line in my logs :
2013-05-21 00:03:59 10.77.200.249 POST /tms/external/booking/BookingService.asmx - 80 video\tmslotus 10.77.y.y Axis/1.3 200 0 0 31
where 10.77.y.y is my Lotus Server
Thanks for return and I hope you can provide a bug id with a version of resolution.
Regards,
Cecile
05-31-2013 05:55 AM
cecile gallien wrote:
[...] I hope you can provide a bug id with a version of resolution.
Bug ID: CSCuh24788. We'll fix it the next possible TMS release – 14.2.2.
Regards,
Kjetil
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide