02-03-2023 12:57 PM
Hi there, what would be the best case usage for this feature? Or shall I ask it this way, can this be used for disaster recovery/failover for outbound calls.
1st entry Local Route Group Settings is our on-prem PRI's
2nd entry Local Route Group Settings is our remote site's PRI's
If 1st entry PRI's goes down or all channels in use, will my next outbound call go out the 2nd entry of PRI's? (Using same Route Pattern)
02-03-2023 04:47 PM - edited 02-03-2023 04:56 PM
To configure redundant paths for your outbound calls, you can simply add two or more Gateways/SIP trunks to your Route Group.
A Standard Local Route Group, on the other hand, does not play any roles in creating call path redundancy but rather it's a useful feature for reducing the number Route Lists and Route Patterns in large clusters with numerous locations/PSTN connections.
Let's say you have 20 sites (1 HQ and 19 Remote sites) whithin the same CUCM cluster, and each site has its own gateway/PSTN connection.
In this scenario, WITHOUT the use of Standard Local Route Groups, you would need to create 1 route group, 1 Route List, and at least 3 route patterns (i.e Local, Long Distance, Emergency and etc.) for EVERY single location.
This means a total of 20 Route Groups, 20 Route Lists and at least 60 Route Patterns. It can get very messy and even worse as the number of your sites grow. This is where Standard Local Route Groups come in.
With the use of Standard Local Route Groups, in the scenario above, you would still need 20 Route Groups, but only 1 Route List and 3 or a few more Route Patterns for the entire cluster, NOT for every location anymore.
Example below shows the usage of Standard Local Route Group in a cluster with only two sites but the concept is the same for any number of sites.
HQ_Route_Group
First path= HQ_Gateway
Second path= RemoteSite_Gateway
RemoteSite_Route_Group
First path= RemoteSite_Gateway
Second path= HQ_Gateway
SLRG Name
Standard Local Route Group
All_Site_Route_List
Route Group= Standard Local Route Group
9.[2-9]XX[2-9]XXXXXX
Route List = All_Site_Route_List
91.[2-9]XX[2-9]XXXXXX
Route List = All_Site_Route_List
911
Route List = All_Site_Route_List
HQ_ Device_Pool
Local Route Group = HQ_Route_Group
Site B Device Pool
Local Route Group = RemoteSite_Route_Group
Hope this helps answer your question.
02-03-2023 05:11 PM
Hi TechLvr,
Yes, I have 2 Gateways in the Route Group already. But if these 2 Gateways went down, I was mislead to believe that the 2nd group in Standard Local Route Group (or rather on the Local Route Group Settings) that this Route Group would assume call processing. Is that not the case? The only "rollover" would be in Route Group itself?
02-03-2023 06:25 PM
Scenario 1:
Route List
Route Group 1 (Gateway A, Gateway B)
Route Group 2 (Gateway C, Gateway D)
In scenario 1, the 2 Route Groups are directly associated with a Route List. If Group 1 (gateways A and B) go down, the Route List will then start hunting Route Group 2 (Gateway C and D).
Scenario 2:
Route List
Standard Local Route Group 1
Standard Local Route Group 2
Device Pool > LRG > Standard Local Route Group 1 > Route Group 1 (Gateway A, Gateway B)
Standard Local Route Group 2 > Route Group 2 (Gateway B, Gateway C)
In scenario 2, Route Group 1 and Route Group 2 are not associated with the Route List. Instead, the Route List is pointed to SLRG 1 and SLRG 2. Then, at the device pool level, SLRG 1 is associated with Route Group 1 (Gateway A and Gateway B), and SLRG 2 is associated with Route Group 2 (Gateway B and Gateway C). Now, if SLRG1/Route Group 1 (Gateway A and Gateway B) goes down, the Route List will start hunting SLRG 2/Route Group 2 (Gateway B and Gateway C).
It is NOT recommended to combine scenario 1 and scenario 2.
02-06-2023 09:32 AM
Perfect explanation TechLvr, thank you !!!
02-06-2023 12:25 PM
TechLvr, one last question, for Scenario 1 and Scenario 2, what is the expected behaviour for an outbound call if for Scenario1 Route Group 1's Gateway A and Gateway B are all "busy" on calls, here I expect the call to roll over to Route Group 2.
But with Scenarion 2, is a busy encounter on SLRG 1 still going to roll the call over to SLRG 2? Even if SLRG 1 is T1/PRI and SLRG 2 is SIP?
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide