03-22-2012 03:57 AM - edited 03-19-2019 04:38 AM
Has anyone heard if/when Cisco is going to relax the co-residency policy?
http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Unified_Communications_Virtualization_Sizing_Guidelines
Co-residency of UC with 3rd-party application VMs (such as TFTP/SFTP/DNS/DHCP servers, Directories, Groupware, File/print, CRM, VMware vCenter, etc.) is not supported at this time. These applications may be placed on a separate physical server from UC. For UCS B-series, this can be an adjacent blade in the same chassis.
This is something a lot o customers have problems?
03-22-2012 04:02 AM
Hi,
As of now, No news of relaxation.
Regards
Ronak patel
Pleaes rate helpful posts.
03-22-2012 05:40 AM
Yes, this is a very common request from a lot of customers, but unfortunately I do not see Cisco changing it anytime soon. I understand it would be impossible for them to support it due to so many possible variations and the amount of testing they would have to do.
HTH,
Chris
05-11-2012 02:21 PM
This is now supported, but with "rules". See updated page at URL above.
05-25-2012 12:08 PM
Reading throught the new 'rules'...any idea when Unified Attendant Consoles will become co-resident supported?
05-26-2012 11:02 AM
Yes, Attendant Consoles are supported now to be co-resident with other UC applications.
Chris
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide