Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Dear All,I got an ethernet backbone that do not support jumbo frame. The backbone connected my Cisco7206/NPE-G2 and Cisco7507 on each side. The topology as below:Cisco7206-Gi0/1<---Ethernet--->Cisco7507-F5/1/0.50 (I am using 802.1q sub-interface)The ...
Hi all,My network is using OSPF, i need to do unequal load balancing in two links. Use static route or PBR it could cause the auto-recovery problem. If one of the link down it will not tune to another link automatically, i need to modify the static r...
Hi all,My MTU issue has been solved. But I found something strange. Actually the problem was not caused by the link, it is related to PA-FE sub-interface. Below two scenario may demonstrate that.Scenario 1 TOP:PE1(Gi0/1)<----->(Fa5/1/0.100)PE2(Fa5/1/...
Thanks all! But if my backbone can only support MTU 1500byte(not including 14byte ethernet header), is there is any way can make my MPLS-VPN network to support standard IP MTU 1500byte? I think fragmentation is needed.
Hi Paul,I agree with you that EIGRP is much suitable in my network, i will consider migrate to EIGRP. Int fa 0/4 no switchport ip add 172.19.32.5 255.255.255.252 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.39.32.6 In this scenario, only if the physical fa0/4 goes d...
Hi Ankur and paul,Floating static routes cannot achieve auto-recovery due to the Fastethernet interfacestatus cannot represent the actual link status. Could you please provide more detail about the PBR and auto-recovery? I have ever consider use stat...
