Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi everyone,I’m currently trying to configure an outside interface with DHCP on an FTD device managed by FMC, but I’m running into an issue where FMC only allows me to assign a static IP address and doesn’t provide an option for DHCP.Has anyone encou...
Hello Cisco Community Team,We are currently using Cisco SD-WAN (vManage) and running into confusion with Centralized Policy and Policy Group configuration.At the moment, both Centralized Policy and Policy Group are configured in our environment. Howe...
Hello,I'm trying to configure LACP bonding between a Windows Server and Cisco ACI fabric, but the port-channel is not forming properly. I need help troubleshooting this issue.Is there anything specific I need to configure on the ACI side for Windows ...
We're currently experiencing an issue with Cisco ISE where wireless users are receiving the error:wireless user failed and machine This occurs when a user attempts to connect for the first time.Here are some key points about the situation:There are n...
Hi everyone,I'm reviewing the VRRP logs from my router and came across the following entries:Mar 12 03:20:18.860: %VRRP-6-STATE: GigabitEthernet0/0/2.1 IPv4 group 1 state BACKUP -> MASTER
Mar 12 03:20:18.905: %VRRP-6-STATE: GigabitEthernet0/0/2.2 IPv...
What I’m asking is: can we configure the router under a Configuration Group, and at the same time use AAR based on the traditional (old) method for that site? Is that combination supported, or we need to use the Policy Group level.?
Will Application-Aware Routing (AAR) continue to operate as expected under the existing traditional centralized policy, or is it required to configure AAR within a Policy Group instead?
