Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi Following "Another Discussion " i have this problem which the output of "show mpls forwarding-table exact-route" is not correct.i tested it on both ASR903(15.6(2)SP) and CSR1000V(15.4(3)S)this is the output of my csr1000vit says that its going to ...
Hi I'm looking for methods of balancing l2vpn traffic on ASR920 but i cant find any documents about it.I have an ASR920-12CZ-D running IOS 16.9.1 and it does have the FAT and entropy CLI commands. When it wasnt in production, i tested FAT (Flow Aware...
Hi EveryoneI'm using ASR920 and ASR900 platforms for MPLS and metro environment and I'm facing a weird behavior on their etherchannels.for example i have an ASR920 PE with 2x10G bundled links to a C4500x.in the ASR920 i have set the load-balancing me...
Hi everyoneWe have an asr9k-x64 (V7.9.21) with an A9K-48X10GE-1G-TR linecard.we have bundled 8 TenG Links to BE5 with the following configs for each vlan: interface Bundle-Ether5.10 l2transport
description VLAN10
encapsulation dot1q 10
rewrite ingre...
Hihere is the scenario.We are giving 3Gbps internet service to a user through 2 connection.there are 2 different vlan ids and 2 bgp peers with the user.we the serving the service on an ASR1002-HX and the vlans are coming through a port-channel with 2...
Hello again @Harold Ritter and @MHM Cisco World I guessed that maybe the reason why the asr903 (P router) wouldnt do the load balancing was the lack of control word on the mikrotik PE side.I did enable the control word on mikrotik so the P routers w...
Hi @Harold Ritter You are right about the PE side. I forgot that it always sends the traffic through Gi2.10 (no FAT or Entropy)I played with the vc ids and finally got the P router which should do the balance in MPLS core, do the bottom label lookup ...
The one i just posted is the PE but i tried on both of them and they are the same.the "v" in the mpls forwarding table is for l3vpn vrf prefixes.in my scenario, there is only l2vpn traffic. (which i have the problem)I think there is a bug or maybe a ...
Hi @MHM Cisco World yes i do see 2 paths.normally, the traffic of each vc should pass through one link. and if there are multiple links and vc s, they should get balanced.PE.LEFT#show mpls forwarding-table 172.16.1.3
Local Outgoing Prefix ...
