Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
We have deployed a virtual network which will house multiple SGTs that the outgoing traffic would need higher priority, and it seemed the "Consumer" policies with Application QoS would allow for ensuring only traffic from the specific SGTs to the ext...
Hi, we have deployed CML 2.8 on baremetal and are hoping there is a way to adjust the system memory utilisation limit of 80%? Our server has 256GB of RAM and an 80% limit on large servers is quite a waste. We were hoping to be able to run at least a ...
Hi,Does anyone know whether the "MAC Authentication Failover to 802.1X Authentication" feature from V8.9 will be replicated for DNAC / SDA Fabric wireless? or there another way to mimic this feature?I am trying to minimise the number of SSIDs as we a...
We have discovered an issue with our DNA-C as it appears to have "ghost" hosts showing as connected but they are no longer connected to the network. Even if the port the ghost host are associated with goes down, the incorrect host stays in the databa...
Does anyone have a recommendation for finding out access ports that have more than one data device connected (multiple MAC addresses) via the DNA-C API? We are running DNAC 2.3.3I have an existing SD-Access deployment with Multi-Auth set in the origi...
Just an update to anyone who finds this thread, there is a process to be able to modify the total resource limits in CML. Not sure whether Cisco want the process publicly repeated. Our server is happily operating with the Memory Utilisation limit at ...
Hi mpeerenboom,Thanks for the response but it isnt really appropriate or related to the core question. The hardware currently in place was selected to ensure good performance for running a significant number of virtual nodes. The server has:2x Intel ...
Can the Catalyst Center / DNAC datasheet, or even better the SDA design guide be updated to include the current supported list of equipment with their maximum number of endpoints. Also it appears Cisco's design recommendations keep changing, no it ap...
The 9800 is the replacement WLC and meant to have feature parity. This is another situation of Cisco removing features, this one is especially useful for older IOT deployments, and Cisco requiring feature requests to bring back features (which rarely...
