Hello!  I wonder if there is some way to balance traffic between a PortChannel with 2 channels of 10G and a single vlan with a prefix / 30 using service instance?   I ask this because I'm now a PortChannel between 2 routers using service instance on a single vlan, this vlan is responsible for various transport EoMPLS, I have done experiments using the system load-balance weigthed and it still fails, the channels are configured as passive as below:   interface TenGigabitEthernet1/1  mtu 9216  no ip address  ip flow ingress  history BPS  mls netflow sampling  storm-control broadcast level 10.00  storm-control multicast level 10.00  channel-group 1 mode passive link 1 end interface TenGigabitEthernet1/2  mtu 9216  no ip address  history BPS  mls netflow sampling  storm-control broadcast level 10.00  storm-control multicast level 10.00  channel-group 1 mode passive link 2 end interface Port-channel1  mtu 9216  no ip address  no ip unreachables  no ip proxy-arp  ip flow ingress  mls netflow sampling  storm-control broadcast level 10.00  storm-control multicast level 10.00  no keepalive  port-channel load-balance link 1   service-instance 530  !  port-channel load-balance weighted link 2  port-channel load-balance weighted rebalance disable  port-channel port hash-distribution fixed  lacp fast-switchover  lacp direct-loadswap  hold-queue 4096 in  hold-queue 4096 out  l2protocol peer lacp service instance 530 ethernet   encapsulation dot1q 530   rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric   bridge-domain 530 show ethernet service instance load-balance  Weighted Load-Balancing Status for Port-channel1  Rebalancing Status   Current memberlink weight deviation from mean: 0   Deviation after rebalancing: 0   Automatic rebalance threshold: Disabled  Link ID 2: TenGigabitEthernet1/2   Total weight assigned to memberlink: 62   Weight from manual load-balancing: 0   Service instances: 1420-1421,1424-1427,1440,1549,3352-3353,3450,3461,3463   Service instances: 3485,3493-3494,3660-3661,3664,3932,3954,3963,4007 Manually Assigned Load-Balancing Status for Port-channel1  Link ID 1: TenGigabitEthernet1/1 (Active)   Service instances: 530   show etherchannel port-channel            Channel-group listing:          -----------------------   Group: 1  ----------         Port-channels in the group:          ----------------------   Port-channel: Po1    (Primary Aggregator)   ------------   Age of the Port-channel   = 29d:13h:16m:53s Logical slot/port   = 14/1          Number of ports = 2 HotStandBy port = null  Passive port list   = Te1/1 Te1/2  Port state          = Port-channel L3-Ag Ag-Inuse  Protocol            =   LACP Fast-switchover     = enabled Direct Load Swap    = enabled   Ports in the Port-channel:    Index   Load    Port      EC state        No of bits ------+------+--------+------------------+-----------   0     55     Te1/1      Passive            4   1     AA     Te1/2      Passive            4   Time since last port bundled:    0d:05h:02m:47s    Te1/1 Time since last port Un-bundled: 0d:05h:02m:51s    Te1/1   show etherchannel load-balance EtherChannel Load-Balancing Configuration:         src-dst-mixed-ip-port vlan included         mpls label-ip   EtherChannel Load-Balancing Addresses Used Per-Protocol: Non-IP: Source XOR Destination MAC address   IPv4: Source XOR Destination IP address and TCP/UDP (layer-4) port number   IPv6: Source XOR Destination IP address   MPLS: Label or IP   The services instances that are different of the 530 are only MPLS transport that travels on vlan 530, but TX traffic goes some only interface in a PortChannel.  the question is whether there is any way to make traffic stay balanced across the two interfaces since the src / dst ip is the same.  follows a brief topology    me3600 (switchport configuration) 2x10G ======== 7606 (service instance configuration). ... View more

Hi All!   I'm looking for some way to make a transparent bridge between two interfaces of a Cisco router ASR901 , is there any possibility? I ask this because I have a scenario where I would use the ASR901 to the following question : POP01 (                            )  ASR901  g0 / 6 -------- > ISG_7206 POP02 ( MPLS CLOUD )                   g0 / 7 -------- > ISG_7206 POP03 (                            ) The ASR901 will focus EoMPLS with other points in the network and pass on to ISG routers , ie , VLANs would have to be two ports with XConnect to a remote router , the configuration would be something like this : interface GigabitEthernet0/6 Core description : MPLS CONC PPPOE02 no ip address negotiation auto hold- queue 1024 in hold- queue 1024 in October ! service instance 4095 ethernet   encapsulation dot1q 4094   rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric interface GigabitEthernet0/7 Core description : 7206_PPPOE_01 no ip address negotiation auto ! service instance 4095 ethernet   encapsulation dot1q 4094   rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric ! end L2VPN XConnect context TEST ethernet interworking member 201.55.127.202 1212 encapsulation mpls group TEST member GigabitEthernet0 / 7 service -instance TEST 4095 group priority 1 member GigabitEthernet0 / 6 service -instance 4095 redundancy group delay 1 3 TEST But without an interface that was redundant of other , what I need is the 2 interfaces in " bridge " making a XConnect to a remote router , and these 2 interfaces connected ISGs in 2 to make a balance . ... View more

Hi All!   I'm looking for some way to make a transparent bridge between two interfaces of a Cisco router ASR901 , is there any possibility? I ask this because I have a scenario where I would use the ASR901 to the following question : POP01 (                       ) ASR901  g0 / 6 -------- > ISG_7206 POP02 ( MPLS CLOUD )               g0 / 7 -------- > ISG_7206 POP03 (                       ) The ASR901 will focus EoMPLS with other points in the network and pass on to ISG routers , ie , VLANs would have to be two ports with XConnect to a remote router , the configuration would be something like this : interface GigabitEthernet0/6 Core description : MPLS CONC PPPOE02 no ip address negotiation auto hold- queue 1024 in hold- queue 1024 in October ! service instance 4095 ethernet   encapsulation dot1q 4094   rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric interface GigabitEthernet0/7 Core description : 7206_PPPOE_01 no ip address negotiation auto ! service instance 4095 ethernet   encapsulation dot1q 4094   rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric ! end L2VPN XConnect context TEST ethernet interworking member 201.55.127.202 1212 encapsulation mpls group TEST member GigabitEthernet0 / 7 service -instance TEST 4095 group priority 1 member GigabitEthernet0 / 6 service -instance 4095 redundancy group delay 1 3 TEST But without an interface that was redundant of other , what I need is the 2 interfaces in " bridge " making a XConnect to a remote router , and these 2 interfaces connected ISGs in 2 to make a balance . ... View more