Hello!
I wonder if there is some way to balance traffic between a PortChannel with 2 channels of 10G and a single vlan with a prefix / 30 using service instance?
I ask this because I'm now a PortChannel between 2 routers using service instance on a single vlan, this vlan is responsible for various transport EoMPLS, I have done experiments using the system load-balance weigthed and it still fails, the channels are configured as passive as below:
interface TenGigabitEthernet1/1
mtu 9216
no ip address
ip flow ingress
history BPS
mls netflow sampling
storm-control broadcast level 10.00
storm-control multicast level 10.00
channel-group 1 mode passive link 1
end
interface TenGigabitEthernet1/2
mtu 9216
no ip address
history BPS
mls netflow sampling
storm-control broadcast level 10.00
storm-control multicast level 10.00
channel-group 1 mode passive link 2
end
interface Port-channel1
mtu 9216
no ip address
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
ip flow ingress
mls netflow sampling
storm-control broadcast level 10.00
storm-control multicast level 10.00
no keepalive
port-channel load-balance link 1
service-instance 530
!
port-channel load-balance weighted link 2
port-channel load-balance weighted rebalance disable
port-channel port hash-distribution fixed
lacp fast-switchover
lacp direct-loadswap
hold-queue 4096 in
hold-queue 4096 out
l2protocol peer lacp
service instance 530 ethernet
encapsulation dot1q 530
rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
bridge-domain 530
show ethernet service instance load-balance
Weighted Load-Balancing Status for Port-channel1
Rebalancing Status
Current memberlink weight deviation from mean: 0
Deviation after rebalancing: 0
Automatic rebalance threshold: Disabled
Link ID 2: TenGigabitEthernet1/2
Total weight assigned to memberlink: 62
Weight from manual load-balancing: 0
Service instances: 1420-1421,1424-1427,1440,1549,3352-3353,3450,3461,3463
Service instances: 3485,3493-3494,3660-3661,3664,3932,3954,3963,4007
Manually Assigned Load-Balancing Status for Port-channel1
Link ID 1: TenGigabitEthernet1/1 (Active)
Service instances: 530
show etherchannel port-channel
Channel-group listing:
-----------------------
Group: 1
----------
Port-channels in the group:
----------------------
Port-channel: Po1 (Primary Aggregator)
------------
Age of the Port-channel = 29d:13h:16m:53s
Logical slot/port = 14/1 Number of ports = 2
HotStandBy port = null
Passive port list = Te1/1 Te1/2
Port state = Port-channel L3-Ag Ag-Inuse
Protocol = LACP
Fast-switchover = enabled
Direct Load Swap = enabled
Ports in the Port-channel:
Index Load Port EC state No of bits
------+------+--------+------------------+-----------
0 55 Te1/1 Passive 4
1 AA Te1/2 Passive 4
Time since last port bundled: 0d:05h:02m:47s Te1/1
Time since last port Un-bundled: 0d:05h:02m:51s Te1/1
show etherchannel load-balance
EtherChannel Load-Balancing Configuration:
src-dst-mixed-ip-port vlan included
mpls label-ip
EtherChannel Load-Balancing Addresses Used Per-Protocol:
Non-IP: Source XOR Destination MAC address
IPv4: Source XOR Destination IP address and TCP/UDP (layer-4) port number
IPv6: Source XOR Destination IP address
MPLS: Label or IP
The services instances that are different of the 530 are only MPLS transport that travels on vlan 530, but TX traffic goes some only interface in a PortChannel.
the question is whether there is any way to make traffic stay balanced across the two interfaces since the src / dst ip is the same.
follows a brief topology
me3600 (switchport configuration) 2x10G ======== 7606 (service instance configuration).
