Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
@Leo Laohoo Well, with this Cisco situation, where do we go from here in world of explosion of AI-discovered vulnerabilities, bugs, etc , both correct and incorrect ? Are there parts of Cisco with forethought to check the same themselves, engage eff...
@JulienRobin28630 R.e. QA disaster and bug fixing, Have a read of this...https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-cafe-blogs/beyond-the-badges-meet-marcelo-a-cisco-community-legend/bc-p/5555166#M3434
@Jay Johnston @sulaxna068debi R.e. QA disaster and bug fixing, Have a read of this...https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-cafe-blogs/beyond-the-badges-meet-marcelo-a-cisco-community-legend/bc-p/5555166#M3434
@Leo Laohoo Yes I wondered something similar, BUT, really come to the conclusion it doesn't change that this is not an obscure problem and that basic quality control for devices sold as supporting IPv6 is needed to be 'fit for purpose' under consumer...
@Marcelo Morais I have a Community and Collaboration question please!Another member has done a beautiful job of accurately documenting infuriating Cisco ATA191/122-MPP IPv6 port binding vulnerability / fault, this issue persists (IPv6 not functional ...
