Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
My network is dual-homed to different providers, but one of the provider links is constantly running close to max bandwidth during peak working hours. Prior to upgrading bandwidth or making other changes, I would like to use local-pref to push a spec...
I've read several places where it's been said that configuring the individual ports in an etherchannel as opposed to the port-channel interface has the potential to cause loops. I've also recently seen this happen due to an engineer making that same ...
Has anyone noticed a 3750 stack where all of the port status lights blink simultaneously? If so, has anyone tracked down the root of the problem?Could you share any details on what the fix could be, or even for those who haven't seen it....maybe a li...
Can anyone give me any insight into this error?:xxx>sho ip traffic | inc encapsulation Drop: 36177634 encapsulation failed, 109 unresolved, 0 no adjacencyThis error is increasing...
I run this command and get 'Net background' as the number one hitter right now for a 3825 that's running at 38%. Anything unusually high about that. I've read what's incorporated in 'Net background' but haven't looked to see what is 'normal'...Thanks...
Let me clarify my question a little more...the subnet I'd like to direct to our second Internet provider is really just one address that all of our guest wireless traffic is NAT'd to. So, instead of a /24 that I want to only go to that specific provi...
....and to add to my last post...even if the etherchannel doesn't get shut down, the switch actually reported that the port that was changed it's state to down:Jan 13 14:05:14.081: %EC-5-CANNOT_BUNDLE2: Gi1/0/25 is not compatible with Gi1/0/27 and wi...
That's interesting...I thought the default behavior of an etherchannel was to shut the entire channel down if there was a difference in the ports in the channel. That doesn't seem to be the case...
Thanks for the replies guys. The port-channel config is indeed specified on the interface...and on the interfaces bound to port-channels that don't have LACP as the protocol the channel-group is set to 'ON' as opposed to 'ACTIVE' which designates the...
I've recently heard the same...was just checking here to see if anyone had any other news. We're currently in a holding pattern dealing with a bug until we can identify the next gold release that works with our infrastructure and issues.
