Thanks, you know if this feature is in the roadmap for VPNv4 and VPNv6?   Regards José ... View more

Hi,   To be honest i recently have time to test in deep in my development enviroment, and i can make that the ORR works with VPNv4.   I follow the steps that the document https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/border-gateway-protocol-bgp/212881-border-gateway-protocol-bgp-optimal-ro.html and i add the configuration necesary to test vpnv4.   The configuration in my vRR is router bgp 65000 address-family ipv4 unicast optimal-route-reflection ppp 1.4.1.1 ! address-family vpnv4 unicast ! neighbor-group PE remote-as 65000 update-source Loopback0 address-family ipv4 unicast optimal-route-reflection ppp route-reflector-client ! address-family vpnv4 unicast optimal-route-reflection ppp route-reflector-client ! neighbor 1.4.1.1 use neighbor-group PE ! router isis backbone_Int net 49.0001.0010.0400.3001.00 distribute link-state address-family ipv4 unicast metric-style wide maximum-paths 32 ! interface Loopback0 address-family ipv4 unicast metric 1 ! ! interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0/0 point-to-point address-family ipv4 unicast metric 15 ! ! interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0/1 point-to-point address-family ipv4 unicast metric 15 ! ! ! And when i try to see if in the neighbor is applied this feature i can not see this. RP/0/RP0/CPU0:RR-01#sho bgp neighbor 1.4.1.1 Wed Aug 8 15:58:45.109 UTC BGP neighbor is 1.4.1.1 Remote AS 65000, local AS 65000, internal link Description: ASR-EU1 Remote router ID 1.4.1.1 Cluster ID 1.4.3.1 BGP state = Established, up for 01:44:43 ... For Address Family: IPv4 Unicast BGP neighbor version 0 Update group: 0.3 Filter-group: 0.0 No Refresh request being processed Route-Reflector Client ORR root (configured): ppp; Index: 0 Extended Nexthop Encoding: advertised Route refresh request: received 0, sent 0 ... For Address Family: VPNv4 Unicast BGP neighbor version 11 Update group: 0.1 Filter-group: 0.1 No Refresh request being processed Route-Reflector Client Route refresh request: received 0, sent 1 ... I will be very gratefull if you can help me. Regards. José ... View more

Thanks ... ... View more

Thanks a for your time again.   Regards José ... View more

Thanks, i could paste this configuration. To be honest is a little bit confuse for me, to configure the feature in  address-family ipv4, to be enable to configure the address-family vpnv4.   I will try continue the deploy in my network and test this feature more deeply.   router bgp 65000 address-family ipv4 unicast optimal-route-reflection group1 1.1.1.1 ! address-family vpnv4 unicast ! address-family vpnv6 unicast ! neighbor-group RR remote-as 65000 update-source Loopback0 address-family vpnv4 unicast optimal-route-reflection group1 ! address-family vpnv6 unicast ! ! neighbor 10.4.3.1 use neighbor-group RR ! neighbor 10.4.4.1 use neighbor-group RR !   Thanks for your time José ... View more

Hi,   Thanks for your response, i try with a new clean config that i attach below and i have the same problem.     RP/0/RP0/CPU0:ASR-UY1#sho runn router bgp Thu Mar 8 16:40:57.037 UTC router bgp 65000 address-family vpnv4 unicast ! address-family vpnv6 unicast ! neighbor-group RR remote-as 65000 update-source Loopback0 address-family vpnv4 unicast ! address-family vpnv6 unicast ! ! neighbor 10.4.3.1 use neighbor-group RR ! neighbor 10.4.4.1 use neighbor-group RR ! vrf Internet rd 65000:65000 bgp bestpath as-path multipath-relax address-family ipv4 unicast redistribute connected ! ! ! When i try to config below the address family without a neighbor or a neighbor-group i don't have this option.         RP/0/RP0/CPU0:ASR-UY1(config)#router bgp 65000 RP/0/RP0/CPU0:ASR-UY1(config-bgp)# address-family vpnv4 unicast RP/0/RP0/CPU0:ASR-UY1(config-bgp-af)#opt? ^ % Invalid input detected at '^' marker. And when i want to configure under the address-family but below a neighbor-group i do not have the option to add the RR IP, and when i try to commit without this option i have the problem that the commit fails with an error !!% 'BGP' detected the 'warning' condition 'Invalid arguments' .       RP/0/RP0/CPU0:ASR-UY1(config-bgp-vrf-af)# neighbor-group ANTEL_RR RP/0/RP0/CPU0:ASR-UY1(config-bgp-nbrgrp)# address-family vpnv4 unicast RP/0/RP0/CPU0:ASR-UY1(config-bgp-nbrgrp-af)#optimal-route-reflection ? WORD ORR group name - maximum 32 characters RP/0/RP0/CPU0:ASR-UY1(config-bgp-nbrgrp-af)#optimal-route-reflection group1 ? <cr> RP/0/RP0/CPU0:ASR-UY1(config-bgp-nbrgrp-af)#optimal-route-reflection group1 RP/0/RP0/CPU0:ASR-UY1(config-bgp-nbrgrp-af)#commit Thu Mar 8 16:10:29.524 UTC % Failed to commit one or more configuration items during a pseudo-atomic operation. All changes made have been reverted. Please issue 'show configuration failed [inheritance]' from this session to view the errors RP/0/RP0/CPU0:ASR-UY1(config-bgp-nbrgrp-af)#sho confi fail Thu Mar 8 16:10:33.028 UTC !! SEMANTIC ERRORS: This configuration was rejected by !! the system due to semantic errors. The individual !! errors with each failed configuration command can be !! found below. router bgp 65000 neighbor-group ANTEL_RR address-family vpnv4 unicast optimal-route-reflection group1 !!% 'BGP' detected the 'warning' condition 'Invalid arguments' ! ! ! end     Thanks for your time José ... View more

Thanks a lot, we will try with your recommendations. Regards                          José ... View more

Thanks Xander, We open a new discussion thread "https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/12386091/asr9010-bng-radiusd-crash". Thanks for your help. Regards                   José ... View more

Hi Xander, We have ASR9010 BNG, should we expect the same limit? We had a problem last week. We sustained several thousand new pppoe session requests  per second for a least an hour, and then we suffered a crash in the radiusd daemon. We try to restart several times the radiusd, but despite of appear to be up, the BNG do not send radius messages. Finally we had to reboot the BNG. Is it possible that this limit affects the radiusd in this way? Regards                       José ... View more

Thanks Nagendra, this command resolve my problem ... The trace looks fine now. I am using IOS XR 4.3.4 Regards                      José ... View more

Thanks Sandip, i  will consider . Regards                 José ... View more