Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hello all,I recently configured a small PIX 506 firewall to terminate internet based remote on-demand client VPN connections (we are using the Cisco windows PC client software) and all is working well. Hovever, my customer would like to see a login w...
I'm hearing from a colleague that the copper GigaStack GBICs are not supported (by Cisco) for IPT applications, even if configured in full-duplex mode (a single cable between two switches). Is this true? Seems hard to believe...Kale KudlacekCCNP,CCDA...
I am having difficulty interpreting the Cisco Configuration guide relative to static route entries and valid next hop addresses. As I interpret the Cisco Documentation, when a static route to a remote network is configured to a valid next hop address...
I have a scenerio where we have a network with two seperate Internet connections on different sides of a corporate WAN. Currently the connections are being used in isolation to save the internal corporate WAN bandwidth. We are interested in leveragin...
Any progress on this? I'm trying to do something very similar, sans Win 2000AD (we are using and RSA server local database). Documentation is very fragmented from RSA and Cisco and seems to be out-of-date. This is a complicated setup!-Kalekale@ieee.o...
Thanks for the reply.What if you were to use a 3550-12G switch and "star" connect 3 3524's into it using two Gigastack GBIC's per switch connection back to the 3550-12G? Each Gigastack GBIC would connect using a single copper cable in this scenerio....
I'm using the next hop IP address in my tests... I think the first poster may have it right when he speculates that Cisco meant the interface has to go down in order for the static route to go away (not just the next hop router going down.
