Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi Folks, I have a 5506x with the following configinside interface 10.0.0.2/24outside interface 10.1.0.2/24 (Public NAT done at another device on the outside interface gateway) static routesinterface:inside 10.0.0.0/8 gateway: 10.0.0.1interface:outsi...
Hello,We're looking at installing a couple of Nexus 7702 devices in our DC and we had planned two different VRFs (1 for an old IP Address range and 1 for a new range that we are migrating too).Lets say I have an NTP server on VDC1, Red VRF with an IP...
Hello,
I'm currently looking at this issue where I want to maintain my vlan but change IP Addresses (gradually). My vlan looks as follows and all works well, however I want to add a secondary IP Address for my new range with ip helper-address for t...
Hi, Has anyone seen an issue with Cisco ISE 1.4 failing compliance checks with Citrix XenMobile 9.0 (patch 9996 & 9989 installed). From decrypting the HTTPS sessions ISE 1.3 looks to have sent the request in the following format - http://xenmobile.d...
Hello,This may be seen as a very basic question but is it possible on a per User basis (9971/7965) running Call Manager 8.5 to translate an inbound number eg 90791234567 into Blogs, Joe (Mobile) on the screen display? I guess if you used LDAP and di...
From memory, it turned out there was missing routes in the providers core which meant some return traffic was being dropped and causing retransmissions (hence why the rfc2544 (UDP) test didn't show an issue but the rfc6349/jperf (TCP&UDP) did).
Citrix have advised that a patch will be required due to the changed format of the API request from Cisco ISE 1.4 to XenMobile. I will update later with the patch number (likely a private patch)
