Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi,
I have 2 Cisco ISE in HA in version 3.0 Patch4 and since a few days ago every time I enter the EndPoint classification and try to edit one of them to modify the description, I get an error.
It says this
The error pops up because the Attribute Va...
Hi,I am using MAB on a port together with the authentication violation shutdown command, but when I connect a device with a MAC that does not belong to any group, Cisco ISE denies access, but the port on the switch remains connected.If I do a show in...
Hi guys,The customer currently has 2 Cisco ISE 3.0 in HA, one is the primary administration/monitoring + PSN and the other is the secondary administration/monitoring + PSN.Everything works perfectly, but we need to renew the Admin, EAP Authentication...
Hi,I use Cisco ISE in VMware environment, I have created a clone of a Cisco ISE 2.3.0 (with all roles) because I want to upgrade to version 2.7.0.I had thought to do a reset-config in the clone after booting to change the IP and to be able to have th...
Hi guys,This command configures the syslog host for all APsconfig ap syslog global host x.x.x.xAnd this command configures the syslog host on the WLCconfig logging syslog host x.x.x.xIs the result of both commands the same?Can both commands be used?A...
Hi Leo,
Have you been able to test or do you have any information if with version 16.12.12 it is still advisable to reboot the switches every 6 months?
Thanks.
Hi Leo,
One last question, the 3850 stack I currently have in version 16.6.5 in Bundle Mode
Is it possible to go directly from 16.6.5 in Bundle Mode to 16.12.12 Bundle Mode?
Thank you very much for your help.
Hi Leo,
I understand then from what you say that the stack will work perfectly without Smart License and that the only thing that will happen is that many logs will appear, but they can be muted with the commands you indicate.
Is this correct?
Thanks...
Thank you very much for the information.
I meant that 16.12.11 is the latest version recommended by Cisco, sorry for the misunderstanding.
One more question, if in the end I upgrade the stack to version 16.12.11 I will also have to take into account ...