Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- Cisco Community
- :
- About Stephane Bonnet
Stats
Member since
12-15-2011
18
Posts
0
Helpful
1
Solution
Created by
Stephane Bonnet
in Other Service Provider Subjects
in Other Service Provider Subjects
01-11-2013
05:58 AM
01-11-2013
05:58 AM
Hi everyone, I just began to deep dive in some brand new ASR 1001. I read about that functionnality and try to play with ... but unfortunatly it doesn't work. - Hardware & Software Info: IOS-XE Software (X86_64_LINUX_IOSD-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.2(4)S2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) IOS XE Version: 03.07.02.S 4 Gigabit Ethernet interfaces 32768K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. 4194304K bytes of physical memory. 7741439K bytes of eUSB flash at bootflash:. - EULA accepted - extract of the "show feature license" ASR1K# show license feature Feature name Enforcement Evaluation Subscription Enabled RightToUse adventerprise yes yes no yes yes sw_redundancy yes yes no yes yes - adventerprise image loaded at boot - I enter the following command and obtain the following results: * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ASR1K# conf t ASR1K(config)# redundancy ASR1K(config-red)# mode sso Jan 11 13:37:58.260: % Redundancy mode change to SSO Jan 11 13:37:58.260: %CMRP-6-DUAL_IOS_REBOOT_REQUIRED: F0: cmand: Configuration must be saved and the chassis must be reboot ASR1K(config-red)# end ASR1K# copy run st Destination filename [startup-config]? Building configuration... [OK] ASR1K# reload Proceed with reload? [confirm] Initializing Hardware ... ... *Jan 11 13:47:49.170: %DYNCMD-7-PKGINT_INSTALLED: The command package 'platform_trace' has been succesfully installed *Jan 11 13:47:49.739: %CMRP-6-DUAL_IOS_REBOOT_REQUIRED: R0/0: cmand: Configuration must be saved and the chassis must be reboot *Jan 11 13:47:49.749: % Redundancy mode change to SSO ... *Jan 11 13:47:54.269: %IOSXE-5-PLATFORM: SIP0: xinetd[10939]: xinetd Version 2.3.14 started with no options compiled in. *Jan 11 13:47:54.269: %IOSXE-5-PLATFORM: SIP0: xinetd[10939]: Started working: 3 available services *Jan 11 13:47:54.271: %IOSXE-5-PLATFORM: SIP0: xinetd[10940]: xinetd Version 2.3.14 started with no options compiled in. *Jan 11 13:47:54.271: %IOSXE-5-PLATFORM: SIP0: xinetd[10940]: Started working: 1 available service *Jan 11 13:47:55.186: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0, changed state to up *Jan 11 13:47:56.186: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0, changed state to up User Access Verification Username: * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * As you can see when ASR reload, it always prompt us to save the config and boot again like it asked when i entered the mode sso command ... weird ! After login when i issue a "show platform" my RP is alone and active but no second process ! Is anyone has already configure that redundancy on ASR1001, the document contradict himself about that support ... http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/asr1000/configuration/guide/chassis/High_Availability.html#wp1058945 It says YES with some limitation and a paragraph below talk just about 1002 & 1004 platform ... Thx for you help. Stephane
... View more
Labels:
11-15-2012
07:40 AM
You have misinterpret the configuration i gave to you, you need to have 2 differents access-list in multicast boundary and igmp access-group. Keep your first access-list you use (101 & 102 with ip statement) in your first post for multicast boundary and use these i gave you for igmp access-group (111 & 112 with igmp statement). Stephane
... View more
11-15-2012
05:49 AM
I think you can use the two for safety: - inside your vlan your receivers will are only allowed to join some multicast group via igmp access-group - ip multicast boundary add another security by filtering control and also data plane traffic in multicast Stephane
... View more
11-15-2012
03:18 AM
Hi, Your access-list in ip igmp access-group isn't in the best format. You must use the same kind of filtering but you may specify the word "igmp" not "ip". Try that: access-list 111 permit igmp 10.0.1.0 0.0.0.255 any access-list 111 permit igmp 10.0.2.0 0.0.0.255 any access-list 111 deny igmp any any access-list 112 permit igmp 10.0.3.0 0.0.0.255 any access-list 112 permit igmp 10.0.4.0 0.0.0.255 any access-list 112 deny igmp any any access-list 113 permit igmp 10.0.5.0 0.0.0.255 any access-list 113 deny igmp any any And if you try to use only PIM SSM because of enabling igmp version 3 on your interface. - disable pim dense mode - you need to activate PIM SSM on the default range 232/8 or on the range you choose with one of these commands: ip pim ssm default ip pim ssm range {access-list} By the way to avoid these kinds of filtering perhaps using VRF-Lite with PIM sparse-mode and different RPs in each VRF is a best solution. Stephane
... View more
Created by
Stephane Bonnet
in Unified Computing System Discussions
in Unified Computing System Discussions
07-03-2012
08:10 AM
07-03-2012
08:10 AM
Yep, i notice it's really obvious. But after some night dead hours of web surfing, i see some paper about NX-7K parent capability in Cisco document for this stuff & impossible for me to retrieve that damn document, i'm disappointed ... I have also see this Cisco document which let me hope that the compatibility was already on: Unified_Fabric Maurizio_Portolani. Because it was dated of March 2012, the nx-os quickly evolves and in the compatibility matrix of the Cisco Nexus 7000 Parent Switch, there was some "bad" clue it seems about new platform support, notice the Blue & Asterisk items without explanation ... It seems that i need to stay with other vendor product then for a time again ... Really hope Cisco change this in short term. Thx ! Stephane
... View more
Created by
Stephane Bonnet
in Unified Computing System Discussions
in Unified Computing System Discussions
07-03-2012
07:34 AM
07-03-2012
07:34 AM
Hi everyone, I recently state with our new nx-os version 6.0(4) SUP1 that we can finally use FEX feature. I need to know if it is also possible to use a Cisco B22HP (c-7000) with a NX-7K as parent switch in this release. I try to test a FEX port configuration until the end with our Nexus 7K, but when i finally arrive in the fex configuration i didn't see the type B22 in the CLI choice: NEXUS-7K(config-fex)# type ? N2148T Fabric Extender 48x1G 4x10G Module N2224TP Fabric Extender 24x1G 2x10G SFP+ Module N2232P Fabric Extender 32x10G 8x10G Module N2248T Fabric Extender 48x1G 4x10G Module What kind of type must i choose to support a N2K-B22HP-P, this one N2232P ? A B22 seems to be nothing else than a 22XX in an HP enclosure... Is anyone has already configured this kind of design, and is this really fcuntionnal ? I really appreciate some background information about this possible deployment in real-life. Greetings, Stephane
... View more
Labels:
Created by
Stephane Bonnet
in Switching
in Switching
03-19-2012
01:40 PM
03-19-2012
01:40 PM
Yes it's in the Conf Guide of the C2960S: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst2960/software/release/12.2_53_se/configuration/guide/swint.html#wp1080632 And in fact, this isn't the same feature that i find on Cisco Feature Navigator. Yours block the negociation to the specified speed it is not possible to have another, the "Forced 10/100 Autonegociation" permit to do negociation of 100Mbps or less, this one goes beyond and it is limited effectively to certain type of Catalyst. Stephane
... View more
Created by
Stephane Bonnet
in Switching
in Switching
03-19-2012
02:49 AM
03-19-2012
02:49 AM
Interesting, but as you can see this technology isn't available on C2960S only on 2970, 3750 & 3560. I just check on my own on Feature Navigator and it's interesting because Cisco state that only these platforms are supported for the feature you asking for: Forced 10/100 Autonegotiation The forced 10/100 autonegotiation feature provides an option to limit interface speed autonegotiation to 100 Mbps or less on a 10/100/1000BASE-T port. Platform Tree Cat4948 with different models Cat4900M Cat4500 & C4500E with different sup card and IOS or IOS XE Stephane
... View more
Created by
Stephane Bonnet
in Switching
in Switching
03-18-2012
01:41 PM
03-18-2012
01:41 PM
Hi Yann, What you looking for can be found in the Cisco 2960S Configuration Guide at the following section "Classifying, Policing and Marking Traffic on Physical Ports by Using Policy Maps" http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst2960/software/release/12.2_53_se/configuration/guide/swqos.html#wp1044737 HTH Stephane
... View more
03-18-2012
01:00 PM
Hi Rajesh, You can build you own with GNS3, simply build a kind of triangle. You just need to memorize that the goal to reach is to reflect back a route to its originator. Imagine & draw an AS with 3 Clusters of 2 RRs each interconnected, each of them by well placed links. Inject some prefix in BGP in a specific Cluster and look the result. Mother of learning is practicing good luck in your study! Stephane
... View more
03-16-2012
08:18 AM
Hi michael, You match the first entry then you execute the "set" statement. You can try to chain with the "continue" statement to do what you want, try like that: ip access-list 190 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any ip access-list 191 permit ip any 172.16.8.0 0.0.0.255 route-map TEST1 permit 10 match ip address 190 continue 20 route-map TEST1 permit 20 match ip address 191 set ip next-hop 10.10.1.1 Cisco Doc extract: --------------------------- Match Operations with Continue Clauses If a match clause does not exist in the route-map entry but a continue clause does, the continue clause will be automatically executed and go to the specified route-map entry. If a match clause exists in a route-map entry, the continue clause is executed only when a successful match occurs. When a successful match occurs and a continue clause exists, the route map executes the set clauses and then goes to the specified route-map entry. If the next route map contains a continue clause, the route map will execute the continue clause if a successful match occurs. If a continue clause does not exist in the next route map, the route map will be evaluated normally. If a continue clause exists in the next route map but a match does not occur, the route map will not continue and will "fall through" to the next sequence number if one exists. --------------------------- HTH Stephane
... View more
03-06-2012
03:00 AM
Hi Guido, You welcome. Try this winning quadruple opensource software on linux: Nagios/Nagvis/Weathermap/Cacti Fine tuning & plenty docs & cisco template to use. HTH Stephane
... View more
03-01-2012
12:28 AM
Always better with a show command to understand. Milan find the issue, Thotsaphon on the other post share a wonderfull command to circumvent the issue: bgp bestpath as-path multipath-relax Stephane
... View more
02-29-2012
12:36 PM
Hi, You can use iperf, very simple/easy to use. The main problem is to have a NIC with a bandwith superior than your ring capacity, or you can launch the test from multiple machine. HTH Stephane
... View more
Created by
Stephane Bonnet
in Other Service Provider Subjects
01-11-2013
01-11-2013
Hi everyone,I just began to deep dive in some brand new ASR 1001.I read
about that functionnality an...
11-15-2012
You have misinterpret the configuration i gave to you, you need to have
2 differents access-list in ...
11-15-2012
I think you can use the two for safety:- inside your vlan your receivers
will are only allowed to jo...
11-15-2012
Hi,Your access-list in ip igmp access-group isn't in the best format.You
must use the same kind of f...
Created by
Stephane Bonnet
in Unified Computing System Discussions
07-03-2012
07-03-2012
Yep, i notice it's really obvious.But after some night dead hours of web
surfing, i see some paper a...
Created by
Stephane Bonnet
in Unified Computing System Discussions
07-03-2012
07-03-2012
Hi everyone,I recently state with our new nx-os version 6.0(4) SUP1 that
we can finally use FEX feat...
Created by
Stephane Bonnet
in Switching
03-19-2012
03-19-2012
Yes it's in the Conf Guide of the
C2960S:http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst2960/s...
Created by
Stephane Bonnet
in Switching
03-19-2012
03-19-2012
Interesting, but as you can see this technology isn't available on
C2960S only on 2970, 3750 & 3560....
Created by
Stephane Bonnet
in Switching
03-18-2012
03-18-2012
Hi Yann,What you looking for can be found in the Cisco 2960S
Configuration Guide at the following se...
03-18-2012
Hi Rajesh,You can build you own with GNS3, simply build a kind of
triangle.You just need to memorize...
03-16-2012
Hi michael,You match the first entry then you execute the "set"
statement.You can try to chain with ...
03-06-2012
Hi Guido,You welcome.Try this winning quadruple opensource software on
linux:Nagios/Nagvis/Weatherma...
03-01-2012
Always better with a show command to understand.Milan find the issue,
Thotsaphon on the other post s...
Public Statistics
| Date Registered | 12-15-2011 05:52 AM |
| Date Last Visited | 12-04-2019 12:49 AM |
| Total Messages Posted | 18 |
Helpful Votes Given To
