Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi,I use tracking objects aroung the organization where I work to monitor WAN and VPN connections and add/remove routes based on the state of the object. I'm having 2 locations that are constanty going up and down and I've been troubleshooting and m...
Is LDAP web authentication supported on the AIR-WLC2006-K9? There is a place to add LDAP servers in there but I can't seem to get the web authentication piece of it to work. I saw some idications on forum posts online that made m...
Hello,Is there any way to do layer 3 security like a web login to an LDAP server on the wireless portion of the SA 520W?I'm asking because we have this set up on many of our Cisco Wireless Controllers and I would like to do it on the SA520's as well....
Hello,We would like to deploy two VSS clusters, one at our main office and the other at a co-location site. We are currently running two HP switches that handle all of the switching between these sites. We have two connections between the two sites...
So I've been monitoring for a week with smokeping and I don't really see any latency issues. I did noticed, however, that both of these interfaces experiencing the issue are on the same card/wic slot. Any chance that this could somehow be a physica...
OK I'll get a smokeping set up and start to monitor. I do have an output policy on the interface that track 1 is tied to but not track 2. Track 2 is the one that seems to drop more anyways. Is there a way to see if ICMP traffic is getting dropped?...
Thanks for the reply...I hadn't thought of that. I can monitor the load of the interfaces, however, it seems like when monitoring before the load was relatively light.Here is the config for track 1 and 2:track 1 ip sla 1 reachability!track 2 ip sla ...
Agreed! I'd like to see a config example too. We tried to do multiple nat statements and let cef load-balance them but that didn't work the way we thought it would =/Thanks!
