Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi,
I have a question regarding QOS. Consider the following topology - IP-Phone > 2960 > 2x10Gb up to > 3850.
The IP Phone is obtaining its Cos 5 and DSCP 46 markers from the local DHCP server, all good there.
When making a VoIP call i can see the tr...
Hi,Looking at the stats below from the ACE. Can anybody confirm if the hits are only successful negotiations? or are the hits a mixture of rejected/denied and successful negotiations?Cheers LAB/Production# sh stats crypto server cipher+-------------...
Hi,Can somebody tell me the TCP behaviour in this scenario.- An end user is browsing a website via HTTP through an ACE- Both web servers start to fail the HTTP probe because the downstream SQL server fails- The VIP policy goes into a OUT OF SERVICE s...
Hi, Does anybody know if the ACE has the ability to advise the downstream SMTP servers of the original source IP client address when the ACE is deployed on a stick? Currently the SMTP servers are just seeing the source address of the load balancer be...
Hi, My colleague and i are struggling to originate a IPv6 BGP default route from one of our core switches to an eBGP peer. This is the configuration (below) we have tried and does work within GNS3 running the same IOS but it doesn't seem to work on o...
Thank you for the response. We have failaction purge configured already - we ran wireshark and actually saw a TCP RST when the VIP went out of service so that's all good!Cheers
Hi Kanwal, yeah I was looking at this but was hoping there's another resolution with out changing the under lying infrastructure - for example the routing. Thanks for the response.
Hi Paul, thanks for the response. We have tried that it doesn't work. We have just found out the switch has a problem dealing with a bogus route ::/8 and the default route ::/0. If we drop ::/8 on the edge ::/0 appears in the routing table, if we per...
I've resolved this by removing carrier delay 30 from the physical ACE interfaces. As the ACE is connecting to the 2K where spanning-tree is not running so there is no requirement for carrier delay on the ACE.