Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi,I have a colleague who accidentially purchased a number of 1130AG LAP access points. They have since converted them to autonomous and can now configure them.The problem now is that they appear in Cisco Network Assistant as "unknown devices". I am ...
Hi all,I have an issue where we have two links (ipsec tunnels) going to the same destination. What I am trying to do is split traffic on these two links based on the source address. (For example splitting staff and student subnets - one down each of ...
Hi,I have installed a 2851 with 4 x ADSL-HWIC's. Using CEF it is balancing the load across the links. All up it is working well, however there is only one issue at this stage.On a few web sites you can access things fine except then when you click on...
Hi all,Just wondering if someone can provide some assistance with my issue.Just installed a new 2851. Both ethernet interfaces (gi0/0 & gi0/1) are configured for a bridge-group. Both of these ports are connected to a 3750 switch.The issue is when I c...
Hi all,Hoping someone can assist with this.I am setting up a 2851 with 3 x HWIC-1ADSL interfaces.Each ADSL has it's own external IP address. What do I need to do in terms of routing in order to tell the router whatever data comes in on a given ADSL n...
Thanks for your response. They have existing 1130's in CNA but not the 1130 LAP's which were converted to autonomous. I'm still wondering if this is because the CDP information still reporting the model as a LAP?
I have the same issue. I have attached my 2851 router config.It matches packets with the access-list, and the route-map is also matching packets, but not directing them to the Dialer2 interface.Can anyone shed light on this?Thanks
Thanks for your responseI created an acl, a route-map and applied it to the incoming interface on the router. It is matching packets correctly however it is not routing them.If I add a static route to one interface it works, then if I remove this sta...
Ok, I had:bridge irbandbridge 140 route ipHowever I didn't have:bridge 140 protocol ieeeI added the above into the config, and spanning-tree kicked in. Then connected the second physical link to the router and spanning-tree blocked the second port. A...
