Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hello,
I have a ASA5505 at SiteA that currently has a site to site VPN tunnel established with SiteB. Everything is working, users are able to access their shared drives, files, etc. that are at SiteB. However, when I am at SiteA and do a tracerout...
Hello,I have a site to site vpn that has been setup about a few months ago. I just realized that the layer 3 switch connected to the ASA 5505 (Site A) is unable to ping a VLAN (229) that resides at Site B. I have two other switches that are trunked t...
I am having issues pinging a switch that is directly connected to the switch I am currently plugged into. My laptop is plugged into Gi0/3 on Switch1 with an IP of 10.0.100.50/24 and a gateway of 10.0.100.1. I am able to ping the SVI for VLAN 100 and ...
I have an issue regaridng EIGRP and VLANs. I have two layer 3 switches connected together via a /30 subnet. Both of these switches have the same SVI (VLAN 99) for management and are showing up/up. From Switch1 I am unable to ping the VLAN 99 interfac...
I currently have a WS-C3560-24PS with SW Version 12.1(19)EA1d. The lowest version I can find on Cisco is 12.2(25)SE but the minimum IOS version needed for the upgrade is 12.2(18)SE. I am unable to find 12.2(18)SE. Any help would be greatly appreciate...
So if I am understanding correctly, adding the below network-object is like saying 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 VPN Tunnel?
object-group network WG_Tunnel description WG Remote Networks network-object 10.1.45.0 255.255.255.0 network-object 172.16.48.0 255.255.2...
Yes, the attached config is for SiteA.
SiteB has a WatchGuard Firebox M400 and I know how to configure the VPN tunnel to allow internet traffic to pass through this firewall. I just don't know how I should go about configuring the Cisco ASA 5505.
...
Ok, that worked using an extended ping. However, my radius server resides on VLAN 229 (192.168.229.95) and that layer 3 switch does not know how to reach 229.95. Could it be a routing issue with the layer 3 switch?
