Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
We are using MSRPC inspection on Cisco 2900 with ZBFW and everything works fine, we started installing 4300's running IOS-XE and MSRPC inspection is no longer working. The hardware says 1000V, but I'm assuming this would affect any device running IO...
Will make this short and simple. We have an old VPN 3000 that we are replacing with ASA 5515X. We use EIGRP on our internal network. For VPN lan-to-lan traffic we force it out to the VPN 3000 using static routes. The Nexus 7k and VPN3000 have a l...
I know this is possible on our VPN3000. I do this for for a few remote sites. Basically we have an internal 172.16.x.x address we NAT to a publicly registered IP if the destination matches x.x.x.x/x.x.x.x. This makes it easy on the remote side as ...
I'm helping our Windows Admins configure WOL. To make it so I didn'have to worry about IP directed broadcast, I am simply trunking all the needed VLANS (like 4 or 5) to the windows box, and they will bring up a local interface on each VLAN to send t...
Not yet. We changed our UCM so all Webex calls aren't routed through the Edgegateway for the time being while we were in holiday blackout. Now that blackout period is over we are going to start troubleshooting again. Out plan to packet capture goin...
We are having the exact same issue with audio from desktop ip phones connecting to Webex through our Edge Gateways and when the user enters their user ID number...dead air. Hang up, try again and usually works...if they just hit pound it seems to al...
Entered and TAC and pleasantly got a quick response. Of the two options setting a tunnel to answer only is the cleaner and simpler option. I tested and it does only inject the route when the tunnel comes up. While this will work when clients/vendo...
I actaully figured it out...maybe this post got my brain back on track...What I had to do was put in a NAT "NO-exemption" for 172.16.1.1. This precedes the the NAT exemption rule/acl that was already in place for the tunnel.I already had a static 17...
