Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
I've got multiple port-channels configured between 2 Nexus 5672's to 9 different closets containing either 1 or upto 3 Cisco 3850 switches. Each closet has 2 fiber 10G SFP's uplinking it to each of the Nexus 5672 switches in the core. All uplink's ...
I've configured an asa running v 9.4(2)6 with SNMP. I've removed the public community string and replaced it with our corporate one. I now need to remove support for snmp v1 and leave snmp v2c although unlike my switches, I can't seem to find the c...
I'm running a 5515 ASA with version 9.4(2)6 and due to a report created after a recent pen test, I've been requested to disable CBC mode and MD5 MAC algorithms on my security appliance. After much searching on the web and using both ASDM and the CLI,...
I have a VPN created between company A and company B. Company A is hosting a server that company B has access to and all is working as it should.The PIX at company A is using a static command to translated the inside addess of the server (10.1.1.20) ...
Can an ip address be NAT'ed to an ip address on a PIX 515 which isn't an ip address of a network directly connected to an interface on the PIX?Specifically, can a host with an ip address of 150.140.102.3/26 which is connected to a network whose PIX f...
Okay, I've tried both your suggestions and neither one had any change on the final status of the interfaces.
1) I verified that the fiber is connected into Eth1/18 on Nexus 5672-1.
2) I setup Eth1/1 on Nexus 5672-1 the same as Eth1/18 was setup. I ...
The problem is that it doesn't appear that traffic outbound from 10.1.1.20 is being directed into the tunnel. Below is a topology drawing of the configuration along with some of the commands from the Pix 515.
Jouni -Thanks for responding. You are correct about the typo, 155.1.1.1 should have been 155.1.1.197The other NAT statements applied to the dmz interface are... nat (int-dmz) 0 access-list 114 nat (int-dmz) 1 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.192 0 0 ...
The first screen shot shows the configuration missing the option to "Use Windows User Name and Password" while the second screen shot shows the configuration option that I'm in need of.
