Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- Cisco Community
- :
- About iswift
06-28-2019
Stats
Member since
11-01-2001
167
Posts
30
Helpful
3
Solutions
06-27-2019
06:29 AM
I can find no configuration guide for the LAN Lite feature set - in particular QOS. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst2960/software/release/12-2_37_ey/configuration/guide/scg/swqos.html#wp1331378 is for the legacy 2960, not the 2960-L. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst2960l/software/15-2_6_e/configuration_guide/b_1526e_consolidated_2960l_cg/b_1526e_consolidated_2960l_cg_chapter_010111.html is the correct model and IOS for me, but contains many commands that are not available in LAN Lite. For instance you cannot use auto qos mls qos trust dscp you cannot match on anything else than cos value in a class-map. I suspect the documentation is for LAN BASE not LAN Lite. Is there any documentation specifically for LAN Lite QOS ? The only one listed here https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/switches/catalyst-2960-series-switches/products-installation-and-configuration-guides-list.html is the old one above. Ian
... View more
Labels:
06-27-2019
01:54 AM
@Mark Malone Thank you for the info, that demonstrates nicely that LAN Base would do the job. It's a shame Feature Navigator is misleading - Thanks again for your help.
... View more
06-26-2019
09:47 AM
Thanks Mark for the prompt response. Checking your posted link there are details of -S products being LANLite and -L being LAN base. my product id is : - WS-C2960L-48PQ-LL the front of my product says 2960-L but the cli definitely says LANLite as per the posted output. Also the bullet points in your reply, were they relating to LAN Base ? specifically :- • Additional QoS capabilities: The LAN Base IOS supports policing, class and policy maps, differentiated services code point (DSCP), AutoQoS, and configurable queue weights, buffers, and thresholds
... View more
06-26-2019
07:53 AM
I would like some guidance on QoS/Auto-QOS on the 2960-L. Image is c2960l-universalk9-mz.152-6.E.bin Feature Navigator says various QoS/Auto-QoS features are supported; Auto QoS 1.5, Auto QoS - VoIP, Auto QoS VoIP enhancement. I have a LanLite right-to-use license :- Switch#sh lic right-to-use summ License Name Type Period left ------------------------------------------------------- Lanlite permanent Lifetime Trying to use any 'auto qos' commands fails. I can turn on 'mls qos' globally, and the only interface mls qos trust option is 'cos' - even if you enter after mls qos trust, it adds cos on the end. Switch(config-if)#mls qos trust ? cos cos keyword <cr> Switch(config-if)#mls qos trust Switch(config-if)# Switch(config-if)#do sh run int g 0/1 Building configuration... Current configuration : 55 bytes ! interface GigabitEthernet0/1 mls qos trust cos In the config guide, www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst2960/software/release/12-2_44_se/configuration/guide/scg1/swqos.html#wp1231112 it says - Configuring Auto-QoS Note To use auto-QoS, the switch must be running the LAN Base image. Q * Is the Feature Navigator incorrect ?? In the Release Notes for my image www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst2960l/software/15-2_6_e/release_note/rn-1526e2-2960l.html there is a note about LanLite+ Features of the Switch The Catalyst 2960-L switch supports the LAN Lite+ feature set. This provides standard Layer 2 security and quality of service (QoS) features, and up to 256 active VLANs. The switch models have reduced functionality and scalability with entry level features in Layer 2, and support Virtual Stacking. Q * Are LANlite and LANLite+ different things, or the same ? Ideally I would like to use auto qos to trust markings coming from elsewhere in the network on my uplinks, and to trust handsets on access ports on the switch. Failing that I need to be able to match in a class-map used in a port policy, in order to match, ideally dscp ef, or even the IP subnet of phones. Neither of these is possible with the LAN Lite license. Q * Do we need another license like LAN Base to be able to support QoS or even better, Auto-QoS I know there are several q's here, but a number of documents suggest things that we don't see in front of us. Ian
... View more
Labels:
05-03-2019
09:02 AM
Thx, got you, we are a partner so sell on. Our guys use Cisco's Solution Builder, which often includes 'bundles' - kit, cables, module, IOS, license, psu etc..
... View more
05-02-2019
09:29 AM
Thanks, this topic isn't at all clear. I'm hopeful that we can use the perpetual license for a customer. Cisco docs don't help tho', and are clearly contradictory - 1 doc says you have 2 flavours, DNA or non-DNA of both Essentials and Advantage. The other doc says there is Essentials (DNA & non-DNA), OR Advantage (DNA & non-DNA). Links :- https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/products/collateral/switches/catalyst-9200-series-switches/nb-06-cat9200-swit-ser-cte-en.pdf states; -E ESSENTIALS - Network Essentials, or Cisco DNA Essentials -A ADVANTAGE - Network Advantage, or Cisco DNA Advantage The other doc, https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/catalyst-9000/bulletin-c25-740149.html says this; Program Summary The Cisco Catalyst IOS Software Update Program (formerly the “IOS Software Update Policy”) was put in place to complement the warranty used with this product line – Enhanced Limited Lifetime Warranty for Cisco Catalyst 9200, 9300, 9400, and 9500 Series. These switches use a new 2-tier software licensing model: (i) Network Essentials or Network Advantage (the “Network Stack”) and (ii) Cisco DNA Essentials or Cisco DNA Advantage (the “Cisco DNA Stack”). The Network Stack is licensed on a perpetual basis, whereas the Cisco DNA Stack is licensed on a subscription basis. This Program applies to Cisco ONE™ license purchases as well as to a-la-carte license purchases. So which model is it ??
... View more
05-02-2019
09:20 AM
That's interesting because in Umer's previous post :- Network Essentials and Advantage package features Features Network Essentials Network Advantage Switch fundamentals Layer 2, Routed Access (RIP, EIGRP Stub, OSPF - 1000 routes), PBR, PIM Stub Multicast (1000 routes)), PVLAN, VRRP, PBR, CDP, QoS, FHS, 802.1X, MACsec-128, CoPP, SXP, IP SLA Responder, SSO ✓ we can clearly see Routed Access is included. To route between L3 SVIs we don't need a dynamic routing capability (a routing protocol) we just need L3 functionality. Playing devil's advocate I'd buy an Essentials license, and be prepared to upgrade to Advantage if it doesn't work.
... View more
04-16-2019
03:07 AM
No, that wasn't the intention. I wanted to tunnel L2 traffic in the same VLAN i.e. a pseudowire or stretched vlan. >From a logical interface, could you not assign an ip address and use a GRE tunnel ?
... View more
04-16-2019
01:12 AM
Yes, the solution was not to try and use L3 ip addresses on the sub-interfaces. I had to use dot1q trunking and make the xconnect using the parent I-f. pseudowire-class PWname encapsulation l2tpv3 ip local interface Loopback0 interface GigabitEthernet0/2 xconnect 192.168.1.nn 10 pw-class [PWname] ! interface GigabitEthernet0/2.701 no ip address encapsulation dot1q 701 ! interface GigabitEthernet0/2.702 no ip address encapsulation dot1q 702
... View more
02-14-2019
09:03 AM
Have tried Fuji 16.9.2 and 3.18.1 aka 15.6.2 SP1.
Same issue. Was originally running 16.8.1b, althoug the bug says it is fixed-in 16.8.1.
... View more
02-12-2019
02:23 PM
It's possible I am hitting
CSCvh54813
The error I get is the same, and the interface is also in a down state.
The detail in the error is the same relatin to direction of policy, and class-type
dir:OUT, ptype:, ctype:DEFAULT
I do not have a class-default in the policy I am creating so it seems a bit buggy like it is applying some default behaviour.
n.b. the default for some commands is packets, I am specifying bytes elsewhere in my config.
My vers :-
System image file is "bootflash:/asr920-universalk9_npe.16.08.01b.SPA.bin" cisco ASR-920-24SZ-M (Freescale P2020) processor (revision 1.2 GHz) with 900278K/6147K bytes of memory.
Cisco IOS Software [Fuji], ASR920 Software (PPC_LINUX_IOSD-UNIVERSALK9_NPE-M), Version 16.8.1b, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
... View more
02-12-2019
12:44 PM
Georg
Thank you for the earlier reply.
Can you explain a little more about the term drop curve. I am not familiar with the term and cannot find it in docs. I have consulted.
Thank you.
... View more
01-31-2019
01:56 AM
Thank you, I will look at the documentation, and also see if there are any differences with later code. I am on Fuji 16.8.1b asr920-universalk9_npe.16.08.01b.SPA.bin.
Until I have read the docs. I am not clear in my mind about multiple random-detect statements in the same class - I thought I was creating two classes; random-detect discard-class 0 45000 bytes 60000 bytes 10 random-detect discard-class 1 30000 bytes 60000 bytes 10
It's not clear from my original post but in an ingress policy on the same I-f I have a statement setting discard-class 1, the other discard-class 0, I assume is default.
policy-map PE-INGRESS-FROM-CORE class MPLS-EXP-2 set qos-group 2 set discard-class 1 class MPLS-EXP-1 set qos-group 1 class MPLS-EXP-0 set qos-group 0 set discard-class 1
... View more
01-30-2019
07:52 AM
I am trying to implemement QoS policies on the ASR 920.
Background is replacing ME3800s with working policies with ASR920s.
The error thrown back is :- pe920-1(config-if)#service-policy out PE-EGRESS-TO-CORE wred thresholds units and queue-limit units must be consistent pe920-1(config-if)# pe920-1(config-if)# *Jan 30 08:11:00.791: %QOS-6-POLICY_INST_FAILED: Service policy installation failed on GigabitEthernet0/0/1 policy:PE-EGRESS-TO-CORE, dir:OUT, ptype:, ctype:DEFAULT
There are no queue-limits in the policy :-
policy-map PE-EGRESS-TO-CORE class QOS-GROUP5 priority police cir 150000000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop class QOS-GROUP4 bandwidth remaining percent 20 queue-limit 52500 bytes class QOS-GROUP3&2 bandwidth remaining percent 25 random-detect discard-class-based random-detect discard-class 0 45000 bytes 60000 bytes 10 random-detect discard-class 1 30000 bytes 60000 bytes 10 class QOS-GROUP1&0 bandwidth remaining percent 35 random-detect discard-class-based random-detect discard-class 0 45000 bytes 60000 bytes 10 random-detect discard-class 1 30000 bytes 60000 bytes 10
It should be noted the policy on the ME3800 had thresholds in the discard-class statements that were in the default unit of packets, but QoS would not allow mixing of packets and bytes, so I changed e.g. 30 packets to 45k bytes assuming a worst case packet size of 1500 bytes. But I don't think this is the issue, I think something in the current policy is causing the complaint.
Or else it is a bug where the error is being thrown up when there is no clash of units ?
All comments appreciated.
... View more
Labels:
06-27-2019
I can find no configuration guide for the LAN Lite feature set - in
particular
QOS.https://www.cisco...
06-27-2019
@Mark Malone Thank you for the info, that demonstrates nicely that LAN
Base would do the job.It's a ...
06-26-2019
Thanks Mark for the prompt response.Checking your posted link there are
details of -S products being...
06-26-2019
I would like some guidance on QoS/Auto-QOS on the 2960-L.Image is
c2960l-universalk9-mz.152-6.E.binF...
05-03-2019
Thx, got you, we are a partner so sell on. Our guys use Cisco's Solution
Builder, which often includ...
05-02-2019
Thanks, this topic isn't at all clear.I'm hopeful that we can use the
perpetual license for a custom...
04-16-2019
No, that wasn't the intention.I wanted to tunnel L2 traffic in the same
VLAN i.e. a pseudowire or st...
04-16-2019
Yes, the solution was not to try and use L3 ip addresses on the
sub-interfaces.I had to use dot1q tr...
Public Statistics
| Date Registered | 11-01-2001 03:30 AM |
| Date Last Visited | 06-28-2019 12:02 AM |
| Total Messages Posted | 167 |
| Total Helpful Votes Received | 30 |
Helpful Votes Given To
| User | Helpful Count |
|---|---|
| 10 | |
| 5 | |
| 5 | |
| 5 | |
| 5 |
.jpg "VIP Mentor"){kind=icon}
Helpful Votes From
| User | Helpful Count |
|---|---|
| 5 | |
| 5 | |
| 5 | |
| 5 | |
| 5 |
