About TheDukeofBaghdad

TheDukeofBaghdad · ‎04-09-2018

I had the same problem: %RADIUS-4-RADIUS_DEAD: RADIUS server X.X.X.X:1645,1646 is not responding. %RADIUS-4-RADIUS_ALIVE: RADIUS server X.X.X.X:1645,1646 is being marked alive. %RADIUS-4-RADIUS_DEAD: RADIUS server Y.Y.Y.Y:1645,1646 is not responding. %RADIUS-4-RADIUS_ALIVE: RADIUS server Y.Y.Y.Y:1645,1646 is being marked alive. The way I fixed it is by removing the aaa new-module (no aaa new-model) and apply it again! I guess there is a specific order that you have to follow when configuring your AAA and Radius servers. Hope that help somebody in the future :) best of luck

TheDukeofBaghdad · ‎01-09-2018

Never mind my fault was very silly issue and I need to delete this topic but I don't see any delete button!

TheDukeofBaghdad · ‎11-30-2017

So based on the output it seems like the Cisco 4507 side is the one with the issue. To verify that I removed the qos command: -switchport priority extend trust -qos trust extend and sure enough the Port-Channels links comes up: CISCO4507#show etherchannel summary Flags: D - down P - bundled in port-channel I - stand-alone s - suspended H - Hot-standby (LACP only) R - Layer3 S - Layer2 U - in use f - failed to allocate aggregator M - not in use, minimum links not met u - unsuitable for bundling w - waiting to be aggregated d - default port Number of channel-groups in use: 3 Number of aggregators: 3 Group Port-channel Protocol Ports ------+-------------+-----------+----------------------------------------------- 12 Po12(SU) LACP Gi2/7(P) Gi2/8(P) 14 Po14(SU) LACP Gi2/9(P) Gi2/10(P) 16 Po16(SU) LACP Gi2/11(P) Gi2/12(P) CISCO4507#show qos interface Gi2/7 Operational Port Trust State: Trusted Trust device: none Default DSCP: 0 Default CoS: 0 But does that mean the switch will discard any QoS marking (DSCP 46 for Voice traffic) on the packets ? Any other suggested solution so I can keep higher priority for the Voice VLAN? for both the Cisco 4507 and Cisco 3010?

TheDukeofBaghdad · ‎11-30-2017

Thanks Rich Uline for your response, here is the output: CISCO4507#show etherchannel summary Flags: D - down P - bundled in port-channel I - stand-alone s - suspended H - Hot-standby (LACP only) R - Layer3 S - Layer2 U - in use f - failed to allocate aggregator M - not in use, minimum links not met u - unsuitable for bundling w - waiting to be aggregated d - default port Number of channel-groups in use: 3 Number of aggregators: 3 Group Port-channel Protocol Ports ------+-------------+-----------+----------------------------------------------- 12 Po12(SD) LACP Gi2/7(u) Gi2/8(u) 14 Po14(SD) LACP Gi2/9(u) Gi2/10(u) 16 Po16(SD) LACP Gi2/11(u) Gi2/12(u) CISCO3010#show etherchannel summary Flags: D - down P - bundled in port-channel I - stand-alone s - suspended H - Hot-standby (LACP only) R - Layer3 S - Layer2 U - in use f - failed to allocate aggregator M - not in use, minimum links not met u - unsuitable for bundling w - waiting to be aggregated d - default port Number of channel-groups in use: 1 Number of aggregators: 1 Group Port-channel Protocol Ports ------+-------------+-----------+----------------------------------------------- 12 Po12(SD) LACP Gi0/1(I) Gi0/2(I)

TheDukeofBaghdad · ‎11-30-2017

Hi Friends, I will keep it short and to the point: I am not a QoS expert so I used Auto-QoS on my network and that break my Port-Channels. I am using Cisco 4507 with Cisco 3010. Cisco 4507: CISCO4507#show run inter gi2/7 Building configuration... Current configuration : 286 bytes ! interface GigabitEthernet2/7 description Layer 2 Trunk (All Allowed VLANs) To SWITCH12 switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,100 switchport mode trunk switchport priority extend trust qos trust extend channel-protocol lacp channel-group 12 mode active end CISCO4507#show run inter gi2/8 Building configuration... Current configuration : 286 bytes ! interface GigabitEthernet2/8 description Layer 2 Trunk (All Allowed VLANs) To SWITCH12 switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,100 switchport mode trunk switchport priority extend trust qos trust extend channel-protocol lacp channel-group 12 mode active end CISCO4507#show run inter port12 Building configuration... Current configuration : 186 bytes ! interface Port-channel12 description Layer 2 Port-Channel (Gi2/7-8) To SWITCH12 switchport switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,100 switchport mode trunk end Cisco 3010: CISCO3010#show run inter gi0/1 Building configuration... Current configuration : 330 bytes ! interface GigabitEthernet0/1 description Layer 2 Trunk (All Allowed VLANs) To SWITCH10 switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,100 switchport mode trunk media-type sfp srr-queue bandwidth share 10 10 60 20 priority-queue out mls qos trust cos channel-protocol lacp channel-group 12 mode passive end CISCO3010#show run inter gi0/2 Building configuration... Current configuration : 330 bytes ! interface GigabitEthernet0/2 description Layer 2 Trunk (All Allowed VLANs) To SWITCH10 switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,100 switchport mode trunk media-type sfp srr-queue bandwidth share 10 10 60 20 priority-queue out mls qos trust cos channel-protocol lacp channel-group 12 mode passive end CISCO3010#show run inter port12 Building configuration... Current configuration : 174 bytes ! interface Port-channel12 description Layer 2 Port-Channel (Gi0/1-2) To SWITCH10 switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,100 switchport mode trunk end The Port-Channel was up and working and it broke after I added the qos commands. Any help my friends? Thanks,

TheDukeofBaghdad · ‎11-30-2017

Hi Friends, I will keep it short and to the point: I am not a QoS expert so I used Auto-QoS on my network and that break my Port-Channels. I am using Cisco 4507 with Cisco 3010. Cisco 4507: CISCO4507#show run inter gi2/7 Building configuration... Current configuration : 286 bytes ! interface GigabitEthernet2/7 description Layer 2 Trunk (All Allowed VLANs) To SWITCH12 switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,100 switchport mode trunk switchport priority extend trust qos trust extend channel-protocol lacp channel-group 12 mode active end CISCO4507#show run inter gi2/8 Building configuration... Current configuration : 286 bytes ! interface GigabitEthernet2/8 description Layer 2 Trunk (All Allowed VLANs) To SWITCH12 switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,100 switchport mode trunk switchport priority extend trust qos trust extend channel-protocol lacp channel-group 12 mode active end CISCO4507#show run inter port12 Building configuration... Current configuration : 186 bytes ! interface Port-channel12 description Layer 2 Port-Channel (Gi2/7-8) To SWITCH12 switchport switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,100 switchport mode trunk end Cisco 3010: CISCO3010#show run inter gi0/1 Building configuration... Current configuration : 330 bytes ! interface GigabitEthernet0/1 description Layer 2 Trunk (All Allowed VLANs) To SWITCH10 switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,100 switchport mode trunk media-type sfp srr-queue bandwidth share 10 10 60 20 priority-queue out mls qos trust cos channel-protocol lacp channel-group 12 mode passive end CISCO3010#show run inter gi0/2 Building configuration... Current configuration : 330 bytes ! interface GigabitEthernet0/2 description Layer 2 Trunk (All Allowed VLANs) To SWITCH10 switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,100 switchport mode trunk media-type sfp srr-queue bandwidth share 10 10 60 20 priority-queue out mls qos trust cos channel-protocol lacp channel-group 12 mode passive end CISCO3010#show run inter port12 Building configuration... Current configuration : 174 bytes ! interface Port-channel12 description Layer 2 Port-Channel (Gi0/1-2) To SWITCH10 switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,100 switchport mode trunk end The Port-Channel was up and working and it broke after I added the qos commands. Any help my friends? Thanks,

TheDukeofBaghdad · ‎10-27-2017

hi michael.trujillo, So the Backbone switch is Cisco 4507 which doesn't support mls qos but it support: qos trust extend will this command do the trick ? Thanks,

TheDukeofBaghdad · ‎10-27-2017

Good Morning Georg, The Auto-QoS generate the following configuration, is this enough for this switch: +mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 24 32 46 48 56 +mls qos srr-queue input bandwidth 90 10 +mls qos srr-queue input threshold 1 8 16 +mls qos srr-queue input threshold 2 34 66 +mls qos srr-queue input buffers 67 33 +mls qos srr-queue input cos-map queue 1 threshold 2 1 +mls qos srr-queue input cos-map queue 1 threshold 3 0 +mls qos srr-queue input cos-map queue 2 threshold 1 2 +mls qos srr-queue input cos-map queue 2 threshold 2 4 6 7 +mls qos srr-queue input cos-map queue 2 threshold 3 3 5 +mls qos srr-queue input dscp-map queue 1 threshold 2 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 +mls qos srr-queue input dscp-map queue 1 threshold 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 +mls qos srr-queue input dscp-map queue 1 threshold 3 32 +mls qos srr-queue input dscp-map queue 2 threshold 1 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 +mls qos srr-queue input dscp-map queue 2 threshold 2 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 48 +mls qos srr-queue input dscp-map queue 2 threshold 2 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 +mls qos srr-queue input dscp-map queue 2 threshold 2 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 +mls qos srr-queue input dscp-map queue 2 threshold 3 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 +mls qos srr-queue input dscp-map queue 2 threshold 3 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 +mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 1 threshold 3 5 +mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 2 threshold 3 3 6 7 +mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 3 threshold 3 2 4 +mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 4 threshold 2 1 +mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 4 threshold 3 0 +mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map queue 1 threshold 3 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 +mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map queue 2 threshold 3 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 +mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map queue 2 threshold 3 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 +mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map queue 2 threshold 3 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 +mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map queue 3 threshold 3 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 +mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map queue 3 threshold 3 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 +mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map queue 4 threshold 1 8 +mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map queue 4 threshold 2 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 +mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map queue 4 threshold 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 +mls qos queue-set output 1 threshold 1 138 138 92 138 +mls qos queue-set output 1 threshold 2 138 138 92 400 +mls qos queue-set output 1 threshold 3 36 77 100 318 +mls qos queue-set output 1 threshold 4 20 50 67 400 +mls qos queue-set output 2 threshold 1 149 149 100 149 +mls qos queue-set output 2 threshold 2 118 118 100 235 +mls qos queue-set output 2 threshold 3 41 68 100 272 +mls qos queue-set output 2 threshold 4 42 72 100 242 +mls qos queue-set output 1 buffers 10 10 26 54 +mls qos queue-set output 2 buffers 16 6 17 61 +mls qos interface FastEthernet0/18 +srr-queue bandwidth share 10 10 60 20 +priority-queue out +mls qos trust cos +auto qos voip trust interface FastEthernet0/19 +srr-queue bandwidth share 10 10 60 20 +priority-queue out +mls qos trust cos +auto qos voip trust interface GigabitEthernet0/1 +srr-queue bandwidth share 10 10 60 20 +priority-queue out +mls qos trust cos interface GigabitEthernet0/2 +srr-queue bandwidth share 10 10 60 20 +priority-queue out +mls qos trust cos

TheDukeofBaghdad · ‎10-26-2017

Hi Georg, Thanks for your respond. I did found the mls qos and the auto qos yesterday and play with it a little bit but didn't want to add something I don't understand what's going on in the back! and weather I should enable it to the ports that going to the phones or the Trunk links (The UPLINK) or both? I am reading the document right now. Thanks again

TheDukeofBaghdad · ‎10-26-2017

Georg Pauwen, Dean Romanelli, The phones are 3rd vendor (not-Cisco) but it does mark the traffic with Diffserv 46. The phones are plug directly to the layer 2 switches. The Layer 2 and the Layer 3 switches are not in the same physical location. Since we have Layer 2 and Layer 3 links I think the DSCP is more suitable but will the Cisco IE-3010 be able to read it and use it to prioritize VOICE traffice?

TheDukeofBaghdad · ‎10-26-2017

Hi Friends, I hate the fact that I have weak memory and keep forgetting important information as I have read QoS multiple times but since I don't work with it a lot I keep forgetting it :( Anyway, I have a Network Consist of Cisco Layer 2 Industrial switches "IE-3010" and the Backbone is Cisco Layer 3 Catalyst Switches "4507". I am using a different VLANs for Each system (ex. CCTV, VOIP, DATA .. etc) and the VLANs passes thourgh the layer 2 switches and end at the Backbone Switch as it have Layer 3 links to the other Backbone switches. What is the easiest QoS I can apply to give VOIP traffic priority above the Uplink between the Layer 2 switch to the Layer 3 Switch (Trunk link 802.1q) and between the Backbone switches (Layer 3 link) Thanks Friends for your help. Best Regards,

TheDukeofBaghdad · ‎10-16-2017

So it turned out that the AP get rebooted if it's connected to our SNMP Server .. when I remove the SNMP connection it stopped rebooting! now the problem is I do need to monitor the AP's through SNMP so why it's rebooting ? and how to stop it ?? I tried SNMPv2c and SNMPv3 .. same issue in both cases! Any help?

TheDukeofBaghdad · ‎12-09-2016

Hi Reza, Thanks for your comment. Yes, I have done that and it's working great the problem is with the static NAT only one set of public IP Addresses are responding to the requests! I can reach only the public IP Addresses of the router through ISP1! ISP2 can provide with full access to all 5 of my static IP Addresses!

TheDukeofBaghdad · ‎12-08-2016

Hi Friends, My boss wants me to configure load balance on one of our customer sites: I want to know if this is possible or not (With the below conditions)? If yes, could you explain it to me, provide an example or link to a page that helps me do the configurations? The 2 ISPs are connected to a single router Cisco1841 via two different interfaces, the Cisco1841 is running IOS 15.1(4)M10. The 2 ISPs are using different Public IP Addresses and providing us EACH with 5 Static IP Addresses (1 for the router and the other get mapped using NAT to private IP Addresses on the system). I have to configure NAT/PAT to the two ISPs for load balance. (Done!) I have to configure Static NAT to allow SSH connection from the internet to the 5 static of any of the ISPs to connect to the same machines. We are NOT running BGP and we have to do it using static routing. In case one of the ISPs failed we need to reroute all the traffic to the other ISP. I have configured the NAT/PAT to the two ISPs and it's working! I have configured the Static NAT from the two ISPs toward the same machines but currently, it's only working through one ISP!!! (This is the main issue that we need to fix) Thanks

TheDukeofBaghdad · ‎12-05-2016

Hi Guys, I have a Cisco 1841 router connected to two networks via two different interfaces and I was wondering what is the easiest way to configure QoS on this router to give higher priority for traffic coming from one interface over the other one. I am not sure if it affects it or not but I have also NAT configured on the outgoing interface of this router! Thanks

TheDukeofBaghdad · 04-09-2018 11:14 AM

I had the same problem: %RADIUS-4-RADIUS_DEAD: RADIUS server X.X.X.X:1645,1646 is not responding.%RA...

TheDukeofBaghdad · 01-09-2018 09:57 AM

Never mind my fault was very silly issue and I need to delete this topic but I don't see any delete ...

TheDukeofBaghdad · 11-30-2017 11:18 AM

So based on the output it seems like the Cisco 4507 side is the one with the issue. To verify that I...

TheDukeofBaghdad · 11-30-2017 10:46 AM

Thanks Rich Uline for your response, here is the output: CISCO4507#show etherchannel summaryFlags: D...

TheDukeofBaghdad · 11-30-2017 10:00 AM

Hi Friends, I will keep it short and to the point: I am not a QoS expert so I used Auto-QoS on my ne...

TheDukeofBaghdad · 11-30-2017 09:46 AM

Hi Friends, I will keep it short and to the point: I am not a QoS expert so I used Auto-QoS on my ne...

TheDukeofBaghdad · 10-27-2017 08:24 AM

hi michael.trujillo, So the Backbone switch is Cisco 4507 which doesn't support mls qos but it suppo...

TheDukeofBaghdad · 10-27-2017 08:16 AM

Good Morning Georg, The Auto-QoS generate the following configuration, is this enough for this switc...

TheDukeofBaghdad · 10-26-2017 03:16 PM

Hi Georg, Thanks for your respond. I did found the mls qos and the auto qos yesterday and play with ...

TheDukeofBaghdad · 10-26-2017 02:07 PM

Georg Pauwen, Dean Romanelli, The phones are 3rd vendor (not-Cisco) but it does mark the traffic wit...

TheDukeofBaghdad · 10-26-2017 10:58 AM

Hi Friends, I hate the fact that I have weak memory and keep forgetting important information as I h...

TheDukeofBaghdad · 10-16-2017 09:44 AM

So it turned out that the AP get rebooted if it's connected to our SNMP Server .. when I remove the ...

TheDukeofBaghdad · 12-09-2016 08:34 AM

Hi Reza, Thanks for your comment. Yes, I have done that and it's working great the problem is with t...

TheDukeofBaghdad · 12-08-2016 04:31 PM

Hi Friends, My boss wants me to configure load balance on one of our customer sites: I want to know ...

TheDukeofBaghdad · 12-05-2016 04:35 PM

Hi Guys, I have a Cisco 1841 router connected to two networks via two different interfaces and I was...

Date Registered	‎12-23-2013 09:00 PM
Date Last Visited	‎04-03-2019 06:19 PM
Total Messages Posted	77
Total Helpful Votes Received	5

Re: I had the same problem when i

Cisco 2901 Terminal Server HWIC-16A

Re: Auto-QoS Broke my Port-Channel - He...

Re: Auto-QoS Broke my Port-Channel - He...

Auto-QoS Broke my Port-Channel - Help n...

Auto-QoS broke my Port-Channel

Re: QoS on Layer 2 and Layer 3

Re: QoS on Layer 2 and Layer 3

Re: QoS on Layer 2 and Layer 3

Re: QoS on Layer 2 and Layer 3

QoS on Layer 2 and Layer 3

Re: AIR-AP1252AG-A-K9 Cisco AP

Hi Reza,

Multihoming, Single Router, 2 ISPs, No ...

Simple QoS

Re: I had the same problem when i

Cisco 2901 Terminal Server HWIC-16A

Re: Auto-QoS Broke my Port-Channel - Help needed :)

Re: Auto-QoS Broke my Port-Channel - Help needed :)

Auto-QoS Broke my Port-Channel - Help needed :)

Auto-QoS broke my Port-Channel

Re: QoS on Layer 2 and Layer 3

Re: QoS on Layer 2 and Layer 3

Re: QoS on Layer 2 and Layer 3

Re: QoS on Layer 2 and Layer 3

QoS on Layer 2 and Layer 3

Re: AIR-AP1252AG-A-K9 Cisco AP

Hi Reza,

Multihoming, Single Router, 2 ISPs, No BGP

Simple QoS