Configure UCS M5 server hardware for TPM module.This procedure is written for situation when new TPM module UCSX-TPM2-002B is installed in UCS C220 M5 server which didn’t have TPM module before, so you may need to adapt this process to your particula...
We are doing new Cisco HyperFlex deployment based on C220 M5 servers (UCSHXM5) which come with 4 port Cisco VIC 1457. Two ports on this NIC can work in 25Gb mode, so we decided to utilize this since this is new deployment. Well ... we learned that by...
Hi, I recently experienced some issue to establish 100G connectivity between Fortigate 6301F and Cisco Nexus 93180 switch. I tried Cisco Direct-Attached-Cable (DAC) as well as SR4 transceivers. Interface was in "notconnected" state. I found root caus...
Hi, since version 2.1.2.0 is new I would like to share couple things from my experience upgrading from code 1.3.3.x to code 2.1.2.0. Chances are that this post will save someone some time because this information is not documented in upgrade guide.
...
Thank you for sharing information. I did separate post on my experience on UCS-C220-M5 servers. Just leaving link here in case if someone need it.https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-computing-system-discussions/configure-tpm-module-ucsx-tpm2-002b-...
Finally yesterday I was able to reach the point when VMware stop alerting me on this host TPM issue. Now I will do 2nd server and would like to document procedure for Cisco community. What is not clear for me - which BIOS settings are "best practice"...
Hi. I am trying to install new UCSX-TPM2-002B modules to my UCS-C220-M5 servers and keep getting alarms in vMware. So far have TAC case open for 3 months with no success. Can you please share how your BIOS settings are configured in BIOS > Advanced >...
We have 43 stacks of Catalyst 3850's on code 16.12.5b and another 51 standalone 3850 on this code. We had been running on this code for around 10 months now. I would say that it is relatively stable and has maximum amount of security fixes. So, I wou...
We have 43 stacks of Catalyst 3850's on code 16.12.5b and another 51 standalone 3850 on this code. We had been running on this code for around 10 months now. I would say that it is relatively stable and has maximum amount of security fixes. So, I wou...
.jpg "VIP Master"){kind=icon}
