Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Is there any security benefit by putting in specific deny's for say known bad hostsin a firewall rule base when the rule base has an implicit deny all in it?
Has anyone been able to integrate a Meraki Dashboard into DNA 2.x.We continually get a FQDN error for api.meraki.com on validation.Has anyone else experienced this. We're using a dedicated Cloud port via a Proxy. Connecting to all the other Cisco ser...
Hi All,Does anyone know if it is supported to place the F5 ATM in front of an ISE PSN that is providing Guest and Portal web services only?Can't see anything in the documentation other than for the LTM module. I did notice that in the LTM guide in t...
Hi,We peer with our ISP over dual Internet Circuits. Our Anyconnect infrastructure is a pair of ASA's with a Load Balance address. Pretty standard.Currently we are advertise the public addresses for the Anyconnect infrastructure out of both our upli...
Hi,I've been looking at the SD-Access documentation/webinars and I am a little confused with the overlap with VXLAN. It's stated that the SD-Access is based around VXLAN and that 9500s are supported as Border devices.However the 9500s are not support...
So i appreciate if you have some overly permissive rule and you wanted to stop one specific host from hitting that rule putting a deny in above makes sense.But if you only have specific ip's talking to specific ip's on specific ports is there any poi...
I ran into this scenario as well. Through trial and error i got it to work by doing this:<MLTCMD>macro name testswitchport mode accessswitchport access vlan 999shutdown@</MLTCMD>
