Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Has anyone got an idea on how much degradation I should expect on xconnect pseudowires. I have noticed a DRAMATIC difference in speed (being very careful to isolate it to just the xconnect part).For example, on two ME6524's connected to each other w...
I have two PE switches that I'd like to create a pseudowire between. These are both ME6524 switches. I have the following configuration:PE#1interface Loopback1 description 6524A-Main Loopback ip address 4.x.x.1 255.255.255.255!interface GigabitEthe...
I am working through an MPLS network that doesn't support VPLS. I have a question related to how I can bridge VLANs between two sites using my switches connected to the providers MPLS network. I believe that DLSw will be able to bridge the traffic on...
I have a lab environment where I'm duplicating our production network (to a small scale). I have the following:C3550--C6503--ME6524--C3550 CE#1 PE#1 PE#2 CE#2I have the 3550's participating at CE's to the C6503 ad ME6524 as PE's. At each CE,...
I have a unique setup where clients are utilizing a multipoint radio uplink for connectivity. Their addresses are basically secondary addressing on the GigE on the 6524 switch I'm using.Since the GigE port sees all of the traffic as if it is part of...
Well, I tried 1600 and it did not improve the throughput. There does not appear to be excessive CPU utilization overhead for tunneling the packets, so I'm not sure where the slow down could be?I am open to any suggestions.
Unless you're planning on implementing other clients on the network, what is the purpose of the MPLS? Standard routing would work well if you segment the network into several major "hubs" to which many branch "spokes" are attached and managed using ...