Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi Guys,I just encountered this issue on the ASR9k when i did some mirroring on ports. Attached here is the captured tcpdump. Config:monitor-session WIRESHARK ethernet destination interface GigabitEthernet0/2/0/9interface GigabitEthernet0/2/0/9 desc...
Dear Gurus,I have some questions regarding RR design before i simulate it.Diagram InformationsCORE-1 and CORE-2 - direct interface with GW routers (GW routers goes to ISP)RR-1 and RR-2 - are for route reflectorACC-1 and ACC-2 - are access gateway rou...
Dear Gurus,Im curently using other router brands to use l2tpv3 and i can see issue on the frame size. it can only transfer 8Mbps on 1500 frame size and 40Mbps on 1300bytes frame size. Does cisco brand also like these ? Is this technology limitat...
Dear Gurus,Can you pls clear me up on these, does every hop uses 16 bytes for labelling? Also on point to point routers, mpls mtu is not applicable since i can ping more than what is set on the mtu.R1-1546-----1546-R2-1546-----1546-R3-1546------1546-...
Dear Gurus,Im trying to configure port based mpls, however i find my 7206 doesnt support any encapsulation mpls, only l2tpv3. Is this IOS dependency?Cisco IOS Software, 7200 Software (C7200-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.4(9)T1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2...
Hi Alexander,I cannot remove the ethernet keyword and looks like its the default type. Im also seeing FC Fiber Channel on the protocol when i use wireshark. Jeff
Hi Reza,Thanks for the reply, im just thinking of any routing loops that may cause problem. How bout the command " no bgp client-to-cliet-reflection",where is this use for?Thanks a lot.Jeff
Hi Mahesh,already simulated it on gns3, to share the routes, i made both RR's as client also. is this ok? is there any problem in here just in case i run this on real scenario? Also, what pitfalls i should look at ?Thanks.Jeff
Hi Mahesh,For these topology there are no physical conection with both RR's. So you mean i would just enable ibgp on both RR and they will share routes? Coz both RR's learned internet routes via ibgp so it cannot be redistributed again via ibgp?Thank...
