Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi everyone,I'm working on putting our HQ on Meraki. We have a few things happening in our topology so I will explain it here, so it could be long but I will try to keep it short.We have about 90 remote branches, many of which have an MX and are VPNe...
This may seem like a stupid question, but I can't seem to find the answer. It would make sense to me for to only include currently online clients, but I want to be sure.We have a branch with an MX68, which has a client recommendation of up to 50 clie...
Hi,My company has many locations which we have put a Meraki SD-WAN device at to VPN to our HQ. At HQ we have a Cisco ISE which we use to authenticate WLAN with dot1x. It works with most of our Meraki locations with no issues. But there are a couple ...
Hello,I am trying to configure dot1x authentication for all access ports on our access switches. We currently have dot1x set up for our WLAN with WAP-Enterprise that uses certificates on the Windows machines to authenticate on a Cisco ISE server. Tha...
The real solution was that there was config missing on the switch. If you are using Cisco ISE then you can do what's in the accepted solution to get help from the ISE on what commands you need. In my case the ISE was old and was suggesting older comm...
What exactly was wrong with the authentication? I am having the same issue but can't find anything in the documentation about authentication other than setting the API key and bearer, and I am not using bearer.
Awesome, thanks for the help. I had already set up the new wireless only dashboard network just so I could get started, but I would definitely like to combined them, so I will do that then.
Okay, and that won't mess up the clients coming in from other L3 devices? The MPLS clients get their internet from our Meraki, so they are essentially clients on the MX250.
Haha, that's actually pretty cool. You ended up saving money on a smaller MX. I have no idea how you could plan for that without a meraki already there though.
