Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hello there,I have the below basic network diagram. We have two ASA firewalls, both newer 5500 models. One has Firepower Module and is used for our internet browsing for the company. The other is simply used as an AnyConnect VPN Concentrator without ...
I think I have a relatively easy one. Currently our ASA 5515 with firepower services is only allowing browsing to trusted geolocation for internet browsing through Firepower services at our corporate location. We want to change that, and only allow o...
Hello,My manager has tasked me with changing the pre-shared local and remote keys of our 20+ home office Ikev2 site-to-site VPN's. They are either an ASA 5505 (retiring) or Cisco C881 router. Both are using ikev2. I want to be able to remote into the...
Hello,My manager wants me to find an answer to this topic. We have a class C public subnet that is ours, and we have two data centers with ISR routers with full BGP neighborship to two different ISP at each data center. Those BGP routers are also nei...
Hello, we have 15+ home users with Cisco C881k9 routers that are doing an automatic ikev2 site-to-site VPN connection back to our head-end VPN concentrating Cisco ASA 5525-X firewall. The home users obviously have DHCP public IP addresses. Does anyon...
Thanks Rob this lead me to the right answer. The primary FW did not have a route to this particular subnet out it's inside interface. After making that route I started to see their internet traffic on the primary FW like I think I should.
Well I guess we have that setup already, but I'm not seeing traffic in our Primary firewall for the same destination IP as I'm seeing on the VPN firewall. I see there are no NAT rules on the VPN ASA, but in theory we wouldn't need to NAT them as we h...
After I posted this the light bulb went off of a route map with the remote router internal LAN as the source, to change the default gateway to the LAN address..but I'll see if anyone else has any other ideas.