03-30-2003 12:55 PM
Dear support,
This is the configuration of the routers i use to make QOS of voice over IP to enhance the quality of voice with a heavy load of Data transfer..
2 sites linked togather with frame-relay connection 64Kbps ( h.323 voice protocol )
version 12.2 (3)
ip subnet-zero
access-list 102 permit udp any any range 5000 5075
access-list 102 permit udp any any range 16000 20000
access-list 103 permit tcp any any eq 1720
access-list 103 permit tcp any any range 16000 20000
access-list 103 permit tcp any eq 1720 any
access-list 103 permit tcp any range 16000 20000
class-map voip-sig
match access-group 103
class-map voip-traf
match access-group 102
policy-map voip-pol
class voip-traf
priority 12
class voip-sig
bandwidth 8
class class-default
fair-queue
interface ethernet 0
ip address 192.168.0.200 255.255.255.0
interface serial 0
bandwidth 64
no ip address
no fair-queue
encapsulation frame-relay IETF
frame-relay lmi-type cisco
frame-relay traffic-shaping
interface serila 0.1 point-to-point
ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
frame-relay interface-dlci 16
class VOIP
frame-relay ip rtp header-compression ( it is not supported in the serial 0 !!! )
map-class frame-relay VOIP
no frame-relay adaptive shaping
frame-relay cir 64000
frame-relay bc 640
frame-relay be 0
frame-relay mincir 64000
service-policy output voip-pol
frame-relay fragment 80
line console 0
exec-timeout 10 0
line vty 0 4
login
Well , i made this configuration on both routers and also i face a problem in the voice quality , still not good !!!
the pinging time is not good ( gives a large time and request time out ... with data transfer.)
I don't know why, so i tried the QOS over PPP and it worked very nice and the voice is clear and the pinging time is steady and no request time out !!!
Please advice what's wrong in the configuration of the Frame-relay QOs...
04-04-2003 08:12 AM
With the information that you have provided in your other posts, i understand that this config belongs to the 805 router. Correct me if i am wrong here.
I find that Modular QoS CLI (MQC) - Based Frame Relay Traffic Shaping feature is not supported on 805. May be you better replace this with some other supported model and check it.
04-05-2003 01:35 PM
hi , this configuration i sent to u is a test i made in my lab between two 2503 routers with IOS 12.2 (3)...and still i face problems in the quality of voice ..
And also i tested the Qos over PPP just like the example in the Qos over PPP document ( using PPP multilink and .... ) and it gives me a much better quality ..
Why is that?
Note : i went to a client that have a 805 router with 12.2(3) IOS and i found that all the Qos commands in my configuration are exisiting and can be established over his framerelay link..
Waiting for your advice..
05-27-2003 12:15 AM
I think shaping rate on dlci must be a little bit lower than the speed on the main serial interface. If you clock S0 only with 64k shaping and QoS on s0.1 works fine, but you run in a bottleneck on S0 (long delay/drops) caused by additional FR-overhead.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide