03-17-2025 12:23 PM
I have an existing set of route-based VTI tunnels configured with static routing, which are working. However, due to AWS's constant maintenance, I need to move to BGP on my 4120 v7.4 FTDs (FMC managed). I've used both links below for reference.
However, my question is with BGP routing, do I use my public AS or use a pseudo-AS to peer with AWS?
https://community.cisco.com/t5/vpn/vti-route-based-vpn-with-aws/td-p/4911467
Solved! Go to Solution.
03-17-2025 01:38 PM
Hi @Wrecktangle ,
Since you are going to be running eBGP between the two instances, it would make more sense to use private AS numbers.
03-17-2025 01:38 PM
Hi @Wrecktangle ,
Since you are going to be running eBGP between the two instances, it would make more sense to use private AS numbers.
03-18-2025 08:05 AM
Thanks Harold!
03-18-2025 09:57 AM
You are very welcome @Wrecktangle and thanks for the feedback
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide