09-01-2014 10:26 PM - edited 02-21-2020 07:48 PM
Hello
actually i have situation as discuss below and I'm confused about design and implement which VPN topology i have to choose DMVPN, GETVPN or DVTI
i have 4 branch and 1 main site, branches have 2 connectivity to HQ one via INTERNET an another via MPLS, so i want to have Fail-over on links and also have secure tunnel on both ways
Best Regards
John Mayer
Solved! Go to Solution.
09-01-2014 11:50 PM
GETVPN is not meant to be used over the internet. So this is not the solution.
With this small amount of sites I would configure static VTIs over MPLS and use DVTIs on the internet if the branches have dynamic IPs. If the branches also have static IPs, I would configure these links also with staid VTIs.
DMVPN could also be used in this scenario, but the protocol overhead is not needed in this small-scale-scenario.
09-09-2014 04:23 PM
John,
Contrary to what Karsten suggested, I think DMVPN would be a good way to go with 15 sites. Once you get everything up and working, it is extremely easy to add new sites with no changes needed on your Hub router. Here's a guide which discusses DMVPN configured in a dual Hub dual cloud scenario: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security-vpn/ipsec-negotiation-ike-protocols/41940-dmvpn.html#dualhubdual
You could easily use EIGRP to exchange routes and configure failover if one of the Hubs or tunnels goes down. This document discusses having two physical Hubs, but you can easily configure both DMVPN clouds on a single Hub router.
Here's a document which has some DMVPN FAQs: https://supportforums.cisco.com/document/50111/dynamic-multipoint-vpn-dmvpn-design-and-positioning-questions-and-answers-live#Q._What_are_the_advantagesdisadvantages_of_using_DMVPN_or_VTI
HTH,
Frank
09-01-2014 11:50 PM
GETVPN is not meant to be used over the internet. So this is not the solution.
With this small amount of sites I would configure static VTIs over MPLS and use DVTIs on the internet if the branches have dynamic IPs. If the branches also have static IPs, I would configure these links also with staid VTIs.
DMVPN could also be used in this scenario, but the protocol overhead is not needed in this small-scale-scenario.
09-02-2014 01:51 AM
thanks for your replay
maybe we have to extend our branches up to 15 until end of the year,
in my opinion we can have two DMVPN interface but with single HUB and have EIGRP routing for failover links
is it possible???
and for implementation and maintenance which one of Static VTI or DMVPN you perefer???
09-09-2014 04:23 PM
John,
Contrary to what Karsten suggested, I think DMVPN would be a good way to go with 15 sites. Once you get everything up and working, it is extremely easy to add new sites with no changes needed on your Hub router. Here's a guide which discusses DMVPN configured in a dual Hub dual cloud scenario: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security-vpn/ipsec-negotiation-ike-protocols/41940-dmvpn.html#dualhubdual
You could easily use EIGRP to exchange routes and configure failover if one of the Hubs or tunnels goes down. This document discusses having two physical Hubs, but you can easily configure both DMVPN clouds on a single Hub router.
Here's a document which has some DMVPN FAQs: https://supportforums.cisco.com/document/50111/dynamic-multipoint-vpn-dmvpn-design-and-positioning-questions-and-answers-live#Q._What_are_the_advantagesdisadvantages_of_using_DMVPN_or_VTI
HTH,
Frank
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide