Constantly, I have an error between 2 Cisco Small Buisness RV320. Both routers have the same configuration.
VPN works fine but after two or three days VPN stop and in logs i can read "packet from xx.xx.xx.xx:500: [Tunnel Authorize Fail] no connection has been authorized with policy=PSK"
A idea ?
Same issue here,
[g2gips0] #205: [Tunnel Authorize Fail] ignoring Delete SA payload: PROTO_IPSEC_ESP SA(0xc7935bb1) not found (maybe expired)
Firmware Version: v18.104.22.168 (2016-02-15, 10:00:11) - And i've noticed this version is now removed from the cisco download page.
Still no resolution, and cisco support is also stumped.
I deployed VPN mode Client to Gateway (Easy VPN setup), using Cisco vpn client 22.214.171.124 as client software , therefore i'm facing the same problem the vpn working unstable, for nothing stop to working force me to reebot the RV320 everytime.
Firmware Version: v126.96.36.199 (2016-04-27, 10:46:12)
2017-01-16, 14:01:59 VPN Log packet from 191.xx.xx.xx:62911: [Tunnel Authorize Fail] no connection has been authorized with policy=PSK+AGGRESSIVE+XAUTHPSK+XAUTHSERVER
it seems some bug, someone has some ideia how does solve it ?
I'm having the exact same problem with the RV320. I'm trying to connect to the office using an Iphone using the inbuilt VPN client.
With a PC I can connect to the RV320 using PPTP without issue, but no matter what I try I can't get the iPhone to connect. It is most frustrating! Did you ever find a result. I really wish to avoid re-setting my device and entering my configuration manually when I have wasted so much time already.
As I was telling you, I was having this issue:
If initiator was not setup as aggressive mode I was getting this message:
[Tunnel Authorize Fail] 'g2gips0' forbids connection, cause: Aggressive Mode
If initiator was setup as aggressive mode I got this one:
[Tunnel Authorize Fail] no connection has been authorized with policy=PSK+AGGRESSIVE
I was becoming to think there was a problem with router but not. Called Cisco Small Business Support and a guy helped me to find the error. Was a very simple error, I was using ID in the wrong space field.
For those who find this error with ipsec, remember to have both sites as mirror, I mean exactly the same configuration, that solved my problem.
My future purchases will be Cisco brand. The router I was having trouble with was purchased on 2012, and today, 2020, I got support for it directly from Cisco TAC.