cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
721
Views
0
Helpful
3
Replies

VPN between 3845 and Netscreen 208

beatdaenzer
Level 1
Level 1

Hi

I'm trying to create a VPN tunnel with my 3845 and the customer Netscreen208 firewall.

My side

------------------------------

Hardware: Cisco3845

IOS: 12.4.(8a)

Configuration:

crypto isakmp policy 30

encr 3des

authentication pre-share

group 2

lifetime 3600

!

crypto isakmp key xxx address <IP Remote Peer>

crypto isakmp keepalive 20

crypto ipsec transform-set MEDIUM_SEC esp-3des esp-sha-hmac

!

crypto map PUBLIC-MAP 60 ipsec-isakmp

description xxxx

set peer 2a.b.c.d

set transform-set MEDIUM_SEC

set pfs group2

match address xxx

------------------------------

Customer side:

Hardware: Netscreen 208

Phase1:pre-g2-3des-sha1-3600

Phase2:g2-3des-sha1-3600

------------------------------

What's the problem ?

3 Replies 3

ajagadee
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Hi,

Check the Access-List for the crypto map to make sure they are mirror images of each other.

For example:

If you have a local network of 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 and a remote network of 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0. Then the configuration on the local router should be

Access-list xxx permit ip 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

And on the Sonic Firewall, the access-list should be mirrored.

Access-list xxx permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255

Also, I see that you have configured an ISAKMP and IPSEC Lifetime to one hour. Is this a requirement. If not, I would set a higher value for ISAKMP. For example: 28800 secs = 8 hours.

If possible, please do post the isakmp and ipsec debugs when you try to bring up the tunnel.

Let me know if it helps.

Regards,

Arul

Hi,

The ACL is correct. Here's the debug file. First part is when the customer makes a ping and the second is, when I ping the remote host.

In the log file I see, that Phase 1 is complete, but phase 2 not. I have multiple crypto-maps with different sequenze numbers one the same HSRP-Interface.

Any idea?

thanks beat

DEBUGS:

Oct 5 10:56:00.913: IPSEC(validate_transform_proposal): no IPSEC cryptomap exists for local address ++++ IP MY PEER +++++

Oct 5 10:56:00.913: ISAKMP:(0:402:HW:2): IPSec policy invalidated proposal

Oct 5 10:56:00.913: ISAKMP:(0:402:HW:2): phase 2 SA policy not acceptable! (local ++++ IP MY PEER +++++ remote ++++ IP REMOTE PEER +++++)

Looking at the above debugs, the router is complaining about the crypto local address. Are you sourcing the crypto configuration from the Outgoing physical Interface or a Loopback Address.

Can you check the configuration to make sure that peer address are configured correctly.

Regards,

Arul